1999•California Law ReviewRequires access

Judicial Federalism and the Administrative States

Ann Woolhandler, Michael G. Collins

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

courts should not shy from entertaining diversity-based challenges to state administrative decision making, or even most challenges grounded in federal law, it concludes that, absent diversity, due process reasonableness challenges to agency action should ordinarily be relegated to state courts. 319 U.S

About this research paper

What this paper is about

courts should not shy from entertaining diversity-based challenges to state administrative decision making, or even most challenges grounded in federal law, it concludes that, absent diversity, due process reasonableness challenges to agency action should ordinarily be relegated to state courts. 319 U.S

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

courts should not shy from entertaining diversity-based challenges to state administrative decision making, or even most challenges grounded in federal law, it concludes that, absent diversity, due process reasonableness challenges to agency action should ordinarily be relegated to state courts. 319 U.S

Key concepts: Federalism, Administrative law, Political science, Judicial review, Law, Public administration, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Judicial Federalism and the Administrative States — Research Paper | ScholarLens