2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

Monte‐Carlo Pricing Issues

François Goossens

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Monte-Carlo techniques may be fairly considered as the easiest way to deal with multi-asset or path-dependent payoffs. This chapter develops a method for sampling a set of correlated assets under the multivariate Gaussian model. It also investigates some techniques to reduce the variability of simulation outputs, whatever the payoff. The chapter deals only with multivariate Gaussian distributions: it means that mutual dependencies among assets are measured, two at a time, by the coefficient of linear correlation or, more simply, the correlation ρ. One major drawback of Monte-Carlo techniques is that their accuracy depends heavily on the efficiency of random number generators (RNG). The variability of the simulation results points to some potential error in the pricing. Variance reduction techniques are specifically designed to reduce the empirically observed standard deviation, without changing the RNG. This chapter reviews three of them: Antithetic variates, Importance sampling and Control variates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Monte-Carlo techniques may be fairly considered as the easiest way to deal with multi-asset or path-dependent payoffs. This chapter develops a method for sampling a set of correlated assets under the multivariate Gaussian model. It also investigates some techniques to reduce the variability of simulation outputs, whatever the payoff. The chapter deals only with multivariate Gaussian distributions: it means that mutual dependencies among assets are measured, two at a time, by the coefficient of linear correlation or, more simply, the correlation ρ. One major drawback of Monte-Carlo techniques is that their accuracy depends heavily on the efficiency of random number generators (RNG). The variability of the simulation results points to some potential error in the pricing. Variance reduction techniques are specifically designed to reduce the empirically observed standard deviation, without changing the RNG. This chapter reviews three of them: Antithetic variates, Importance sampling and Control variates.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Monte-Carlo techniques may be fairly considered as the easiest way to deal with multi-asset or path-dependent payoffs. This chapter develops a method for sampling a set of correlated assets under the multivariate Gaussian model. It also investigates some techniques to reduce the variability of simulation outputs, whatever the payoff. The chapter deals only with multivariate Gaussian distributions: it means that mutual dependencies among assets are measured, two at a time, by the coefficient of linear correlation or, more simply, the correlation ρ. One major drawback of Monte-Carlo techniques is that their accuracy depends heavily on the efficiency of random number generators (RNG). The variability of the simulation results points to some potential error in the pricing. Variance reduction techniques are specifically designed to reduce the empirically observed standard deviation, without changing the RNG. This chapter reviews three of them: Antithetic variates, Importance sampling and Control variates.

Key concepts: Control variates, Variance reduction, Monte Carlo method, Variance (accounting), Importance sampling, Gaussian, Multivariate statistics, Sampling (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monte‐Carlo Pricing Issues — Research Paper | ScholarLens