2009The IUP Journal of Agricultural EconomicsRequires access

Contract Farming and Agricultural Development: A Case Study of Orissa

Braja Bandhu Swain

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In the recent era of rapid economic changes, slow agricultural growth has become a major area of concern in academic and public domains. In order to galvanize this sector, there are increasing efforts from various corners of the economy through an alternative institutional arrangement. In response to this, contract farming has evolved as an alternative institution. However, there is a growing debate in the academic world whether contract farming would benefit Indian agriculture or not. The pro-contract farming researchers argue that the contract-farming system could raise the income of farmers by increasing productivity. The critics argue that contract production is one mode of capitalist penetration into agriculture for capital accumulation and exploitation of the farming sector. This even leads to loss to the farmers and gain to the companies. However, the contractual arrangement depends upon the structure of the economy and how the market functions. The present study tries to analyze how the contract-farming system would be suitable for agricultural development by considering a village from the state of Orissa, whose economy is closely associated with a sugar industry. The study concludes that by entering into the contractual arrangement, the income level of the farmer and employment level in the rural economy has increased despite certain problems faced by the farmers like delayed payment, delay in procurement and low supply of agricultural inputs to them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the recent era of rapid economic changes, slow agricultural growth has become a major area of concern in academic and public domains. In order to galvanize this sector, there are increasing efforts from various corners of the economy through an alternative institutional arrangement. In response to this, contract farming has evolved as an alternative institution. However, there is a growing debate in the academic world whether contract farming would benefit Indian agriculture or not. The pro-contract farming researchers argue that the contract-farming system could raise the income of farmers by increasing productivity. The critics argue that contract production is one mode of capitalist penetration into agriculture for capital accumulation and exploitation of the farming sector. This even leads to loss to the farmers and gain to the companies. However, the contractual arrangement depends upon the structure of the economy and how the market functions. The present study tries to analyze how the contract-farming system would be suitable for agricultural development by considering a village from the state of Orissa, whose economy is closely associated with a sugar industry. The study concludes that by entering into the contractual arrangement, the income level of the farmer and employment level in the rural economy has increased despite certain problems faced by the farmers like delayed payment, delay in procurement and low supply of agricultural inputs to them.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the recent era of rapid economic changes, slow agricultural growth has become a major area of concern in academic and public domains. In order to galvanize this sector, there are increasing efforts from various corners of the economy through an alternative institutional arrangement. In response to this, contract farming has evolved as an alternative institution. However, there is a growing debate in the academic world whether contract farming would benefit Indian agriculture or not. The pro-contract farming researchers argue that the contract-farming system could raise the income of farmers by increasing productivity. The critics argue that contract production is one mode of capitalist penetration into agriculture for capital accumulation and exploitation of the farming sector. This even leads to loss to the farmers and gain to the companies. However, the contractual arrangement depends upon the structure of the economy and how the market functions. The present study tries to analyze how the contract-farming system would be suitable for agricultural development by considering a village from the state of Orissa, whose economy is closely associated with a sugar industry. The study concludes that by entering into the contractual arrangement, the income level of the farmer and employment level in the rural economy has increased despite certain problems faced by the farmers like delayed payment, delay in procurement and low supply of agricultural inputs to them.

Key concepts: Contract farming, Agriculture, Business, Productivity, Procurement, Capital (architecture), Economics, Payment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contract Farming and Agricultural Development: A Case Study of Orissa — Research Paper | ScholarLens