Privacy and the Other Miss M
Dorothy J. Glancy
Abstract
Open-access reader
Dorothy J. Glancy
Abstract
Open-access reader
By contrasting the lawsuits of Marion Manola and Bette Midler, this article demonstrates that the property right, often called the right of publicity, is theoretically based in the right to privacy, as extolled by Warren and Brandeis. The author concludes that it is important to understand the theoretical framework of these rights, and how they fit together, in order to appreciate the reasons for the law's protection of these particular interests.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
By contrasting the lawsuits of Marion Manola and Bette Midler, this article demonstrates that the property right, often called the right of publicity, is theoretically based in the right to privacy, as extolled by Warren and Brandeis. The author concludes that it is important to understand the theoretical framework of these rights, and how they fit together, in order to appreciate the reasons for the law's protection of these particular interests.
Key concepts: Internet privacy, Computer security, Information privacy, Computer science, Business