2015Journal of Spacecraft and RocketsRequires access

Designing Transfers to Geostationary Orbit Using Combined Chemical–Electric Propulsion

Craig A. Kluever

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

Although it is clear that electric propulsion can deliver more payload mass when compared to conventional chemical propulsion, near-term transfers to geostationary-equatorial orbit will likely use both propulsion modes in order to reduce the transfer time. Determining the best starting orbit for the subsequent electric-propulsion phase is the key to computing time-constrained maximum-payload transfers to geostationary orbit. Numerical optimization methods are used to determine the unique optimal starting orbit for a given low-thrust velocity increment to be performed by the electric-propulsion stage. This approach yields a purely analytical algorithm that can determine spacecraft mass requirements for a desired electric propulsion system and desired transfer time. Numerical examples are presented in order to demonstrate how this tool can be used to rapidly perform trade studies for transfers that use chemical and electric propulsion stages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although it is clear that electric propulsion can deliver more payload mass when compared to conventional chemical propulsion, near-term transfers to geostationary-equatorial orbit will likely use both propulsion modes in order to reduce the transfer time. Determining the best starting orbit for the subsequent electric-propulsion phase is the key to computing time-constrained maximum-payload transfers to geostationary orbit. Numerical optimization methods are used to determine the unique optimal starting orbit for a given low-thrust velocity increment to be performed by the electric-propulsion stage. This approach yields a purely analytical algorithm that can determine spacecraft mass requirements for a desired electric propulsion system and desired transfer time. Numerical examples are presented in order to demonstrate how this tool can be used to rapidly perform trade studies for transfers that use chemical and electric propulsion stages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although it is clear that electric propulsion can deliver more payload mass when compared to conventional chemical propulsion, near-term transfers to geostationary-equatorial orbit will likely use both propulsion modes in order to reduce the transfer time. Determining the best starting orbit for the subsequent electric-propulsion phase is the key to computing time-constrained maximum-payload transfers to geostationary orbit. Numerical optimization methods are used to determine the unique optimal starting orbit for a given low-thrust velocity increment to be performed by the electric-propulsion stage. This approach yields a purely analytical algorithm that can determine spacecraft mass requirements for a desired electric propulsion system and desired transfer time. Numerical examples are presented in order to demonstrate how this tool can be used to rapidly perform trade studies for transfers that use chemical and electric propulsion stages.

Key concepts: Geostationary orbit, Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion, Propulsion, Aerospace engineering, Payload (computing), Orbit (dynamics), In-space propulsion technologies, Ion thruster

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Designing Transfers to Geostationary Orbit Using Combined Chemical–Electric Propulsion — Research Paper | ScholarLens