2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Logistics: Supply Based or Distribution Based?

Eric Peltz

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The continual need for a nuanced and dynamic balancing of distribution and supply in logistics system design has implications for the training and career development of Army logisticians. A logistician's ability to make the integrated decisions depends on his having broad system knowledge -- on being a logistics expert rather than a supply or transportation specialist. Those planning the logistics system should understand the tradeoffs among the available resources and system design options. Without a good understanding of the full breadth of logistics management and, for some positions, supply chain management, the need to adapt systems as conditions and capabilities change may not be clear or the root causes of problems may not be understood. Thus, as military logistics professionals progress in their careers and begin to play a role in theater- and national-level planning, their knowledge base must expand as they move from transportation- and physical distribution-oriented execution management to more strategically oriented logistics-system and supply-chain design and management positions. They need to become adept at integrating the full range of options available to best support units in the field, no matter the situation. Every resource, whether inventory, transportation assets, distribution facilities, or people, should have a clearly defined role designed to meet an objective derived from overall system goals. If these objectives are well understood and used to drive logistics system design, the right levels of resources in the right places will be employed effectively. Rather than choose between distribution-based and supply-based designs, the Army, in conjunction with its joint supply-chain partners, should seek optimal, balanced logistics system designs that it can adapt quickly to changing conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The continual need for a nuanced and dynamic balancing of distribution and supply in logistics system design has implications for the training and career development of Army logisticians. A logistician's ability to make the integrated decisions depends on his having broad system knowledge -- on being a logistics expert rather than a supply or transportation specialist. Those planning the logistics system should understand the tradeoffs among the available resources and system design options. Without a good understanding of the full breadth of logistics management and, for some positions, supply chain management, the need to adapt systems as conditions and capabilities change may not be clear or the root causes of problems may not be understood. Thus, as military logistics professionals progress in their careers and begin to play a role in theater- and national-level planning, their knowledge base must expand as they move from transportation- and physical distribution-oriented execution management to more strategically oriented logistics-system and supply-chain design and management positions. They need to become adept at integrating the full range of options available to best support units in the field, no matter the situation. Every resource, whether inventory, transportation assets, distribution facilities, or people, should have a clearly defined role designed to meet an objective derived from overall system goals. If these objectives are well understood and used to drive logistics system design, the right levels of resources in the right places will be employed effectively. Rather than choose between distribution-based and supply-based designs, the Army, in conjunction with its joint supply-chain partners, should seek optimal, balanced logistics system designs that it can adapt quickly to changing conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The continual need for a nuanced and dynamic balancing of distribution and supply in logistics system design has implications for the training and career development of Army logisticians. A logistician's ability to make the integrated decisions depends on his having broad system knowledge -- on being a logistics expert rather than a supply or transportation specialist. Those planning the logistics system should understand the tradeoffs among the available resources and system design options. Without a good understanding of the full breadth of logistics management and, for some positions, supply chain management, the need to adapt systems as conditions and capabilities change may not be clear or the root causes of problems may not be understood. Thus, as military logistics professionals progress in their careers and begin to play a role in theater- and national-level planning, their knowledge base must expand as they move from transportation- and physical distribution-oriented execution management to more strategically oriented logistics-system and supply-chain design and management positions. They need to become adept at integrating the full range of options available to best support units in the field, no matter the situation. Every resource, whether inventory, transportation assets, distribution facilities, or people, should have a clearly defined role designed to meet an objective derived from overall system goals. If these objectives are well understood and used to drive logistics system design, the right levels of resources in the right places will be employed effectively. Rather than choose between distribution-based and supply-based designs, the Army, in conjunction with its joint supply-chain partners, should seek optimal, balanced logistics system designs that it can adapt quickly to changing conditions.

Key concepts: Supply chain, Humanitarian Logistics, Supply chain management, Business, Process management, Integrated logistics support, Operations management, Distribution (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Logistics: Supply Based or Distribution Based? — Research Paper | ScholarLens