1980STINRequires access

Damage evaluation and repair methods for prestressed concrete bridge members

G O Shanafelt, W B Horn

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

The research described in this report provides guidance for the assessment and repair of accidental damage to prestressed concrete bridge members, primarily longitudinal girders. Repair and replacement techniques presently being used have been identified and evaluated. Plausible repair-in-place techniques are included with appropriate calculations and details. Primary emphasis is placed on repair of damage from collision. In addition, guidance is provided for assessment and repair of damage from fire, manufacturing defects, and other causes. The incidence and percentage of accidental damages are included. The guidelines for damage assessment and for selection of repair methods specifically address service load capacity, ultimate load capacity, overload capacity, fatigue life, durability, cost, user inconvenience and speed of repairs, esthetics, and range of applicability. Repair-in-place techniques and replacement techniques have been evaluated in accordance with these guidelines by using a value-engineering process. A principal finding of this study is that the damage inspection phase should be carefully differentiated and separated from the engineering assessment phase.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The research described in this report provides guidance for the assessment and repair of accidental damage to prestressed concrete bridge members, primarily longitudinal girders. Repair and replacement techniques presently being used have been identified and evaluated. Plausible repair-in-place techniques are included with appropriate calculations and details. Primary emphasis is placed on repair of damage from collision. In addition, guidance is provided for assessment and repair of damage from fire, manufacturing defects, and other causes. The incidence and percentage of accidental damages are included. The guidelines for damage assessment and for selection of repair methods specifically address service load capacity, ultimate load capacity, overload capacity, fatigue life, durability, cost, user inconvenience and speed of repairs, esthetics, and range of applicability. Repair-in-place techniques and replacement techniques have been evaluated in accordance with these guidelines by using a value-engineering process. A principal finding of this study is that the damage inspection phase should be carefully differentiated and separated from the engineering assessment phase.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The research described in this report provides guidance for the assessment and repair of accidental damage to prestressed concrete bridge members, primarily longitudinal girders. Repair and replacement techniques presently being used have been identified and evaluated. Plausible repair-in-place techniques are included with appropriate calculations and details. Primary emphasis is placed on repair of damage from collision. In addition, guidance is provided for assessment and repair of damage from fire, manufacturing defects, and other causes. The incidence and percentage of accidental damages are included. The guidelines for damage assessment and for selection of repair methods specifically address service load capacity, ultimate load capacity, overload capacity, fatigue life, durability, cost, user inconvenience and speed of repairs, esthetics, and range of applicability. Repair-in-place techniques and replacement techniques have been evaluated in accordance with these guidelines by using a value-engineering process. A principal finding of this study is that the damage inspection phase should be carefully differentiated and separated from the engineering assessment phase.

Key concepts: Bridge (graph theory), Engineering, Girder, Forensic engineering, Prestressed concrete, Durability, Reliability engineering, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Damage evaluation and repair methods for prestressed concrete bridge members — Research Paper | ScholarLens