Interval Uncertainty as the Basis for a General Description of Uncertainty: A Position Paper
Владик Крейнович
Abstract
Open-access reader
Владик Крейнович
Abstract
Open-access reader
Uncertainty is ubiquitous. Depending on what information we have, we get different types of uncertainty. For each type of uncertainty, tech-niques have been developed for efficient representation and processing of this uncertainty. However, the plethora of different uncertainty techniques is often confusing for practitioners. The situation is especially difficult in frequent situations when we need to gauge the uncertainty of the result of complex multi-stage data processing, and different data inputs are known with different types of uncertainty. To avoid this problem, it is necessary to develop and implement a general approach to representing and process-ing different types of uncertainty. In this paper, we argue that the most appropriate foundation for this general approach is interval uncertainty. Uncertainty is ubiquitous. All the data comes either from measurements or from expert estimates. Neither measurements nor expert estimates are ab-solutely accurate, so we always have to deal with uncertainty; see, e.g., [8].
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Uncertainty is ubiquitous. Depending on what information we have, we get different types of uncertainty. For each type of uncertainty, tech-niques have been developed for efficient representation and processing of this uncertainty. However, the plethora of different uncertainty techniques is often confusing for practitioners. The situation is especially difficult in frequent situations when we need to gauge the uncertainty of the result of complex multi-stage data processing, and different data inputs are known with different types of uncertainty. To avoid this problem, it is necessary to develop and implement a general approach to representing and process-ing different types of uncertainty. In this paper, we argue that the most appropriate foundation for this general approach is interval uncertainty. Uncertainty is ubiquitous. All the data comes either from measurements or from expert estimates. Neither measurements nor expert estimates are ab-solutely accurate, so we always have to deal with uncertainty; see, e.g., [8].
Key concepts: Uncertainty analysis, Sensitivity analysis, Measurement uncertainty, Uncertain data, Uncertainty quantification, Uncertainty reduction theory, Interval (graph theory), Propagation of uncertainty