2001•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Two Cheers for Process Federalism

Ernest A. Young

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

F OR some years now, the Rehnquist Court has been engaged in an attempt to revive the notion of judicially-enforceable limits on national power.Important and controversial decisions have reasserted outer limits to Congress' commerce power, 1 developed new doctrinal rules against the "commandeering" of state governmental institutions, 2 and vastly expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity.3 The staying power of this "federalist revival," 4 however, remains very much in doubt.Most of the relevant decisions are five to four, 5 and in many the more nationalist justices have openly avowed their intention to reverse course the moment that they gain an additional vote.6 While the result of the 2000 election would seem to decrease the odds of near-term reversals in the Court's jurisprudence, it seems a bit early to declare the federalist revival secure.It remains to be seen, in other words, whether cases like United States v.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

F OR some years now, the Rehnquist Court has been engaged in an attempt to revive the notion of judicially-enforceable limits on national power.Important and controversial decisions have reasserted outer limits to Congress' commerce power, 1 developed new doctrinal rules against the "commandeering" of state governmental institutions, 2 and vastly expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity.3 The staying power of this "federalist revival," 4 however, remains very much in doubt.Most of the relevant decisions are five to four, 5 and in many the more nationalist justices have openly avowed their intention to reverse course the moment that they gain an additional vote.6 While the result of the 2000 election would seem to decrease the odds of near-term reversals in the Court's jurisprudence, it seems a bit early to declare the federalist revival secure.It remains to be seen, in other words, whether cases like United States v.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

F OR some years now, the Rehnquist Court has been engaged in an attempt to revive the notion of judicially-enforceable limits on national power.Important and controversial decisions have reasserted outer limits to Congress' commerce power, 1 developed new doctrinal rules against the "commandeering" of state governmental institutions, 2 and vastly expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity.3 The staying power of this "federalist revival," 4 however, remains very much in doubt.Most of the relevant decisions are five to four, 5 and in many the more nationalist justices have openly avowed their intention to reverse course the moment that they gain an additional vote.6 While the result of the 2000 election would seem to decrease the odds of near-term reversals in the Court's jurisprudence, it seems a bit early to declare the federalist revival secure.It remains to be seen, in other words, whether cases like United States v.

Key concepts: Federalism, Process (computing), Law, Political science, Law and economics, Economics, Computer science, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two Cheers for Process Federalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens