2011Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Central Banking and the Money Supply

Bruce Champ, Scott Freeman, Joseph H. Haslag

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

WHEN FIAT MONEY is not the only form of money, the monetary authority may wish to regulate money-creating institutions in order to control the total stock of money or to enhance revenue from seigniorage. To meet these ends, the monetary authority, which now may also be called a central bank, generally has two tools at its disposal—reserve requirements and loans to banks—in addition to its ability to print fiat money. In this chapter, we study the effects of each. We also ask in this chapter and the next whether control of the total money stock is always a worthwhile objective of the monetary authority. Legal Restrictions on Financial Intermediation Financial intermediation allows privately created assets to serve as money. One consequence of permitting unfettered intermediation is that if intermediation is not too costly to use and operate, people may choose to use inside money instead of fiat money. This will occur if the rate of return of inside money—net of transaction costs—exceeds that of government-created fiat money. If people prefer inside money to fiat money for every use of money, fiat money will lose its value. This would have two effects: First, prices would have to be expressed in some other unit of account. Second, the government would be unable to raise any revenue from seigniorage. If the government still wishes to maintain fiat money as a unit of account or a means of revenue, it must force people to hold fiat money.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

WHEN FIAT MONEY is not the only form of money, the monetary authority may wish to regulate money-creating institutions in order to control the total stock of money or to enhance revenue from seigniorage. To meet these ends, the monetary authority, which now may also be called a central bank, generally has two tools at its disposal—reserve requirements and loans to banks—in addition to its ability to print fiat money. In this chapter, we study the effects of each. We also ask in this chapter and the next whether control of the total money stock is always a worthwhile objective of the monetary authority. Legal Restrictions on Financial Intermediation Financial intermediation allows privately created assets to serve as money. One consequence of permitting unfettered intermediation is that if intermediation is not too costly to use and operate, people may choose to use inside money instead of fiat money. This will occur if the rate of return of inside money—net of transaction costs—exceeds that of government-created fiat money. If people prefer inside money to fiat money for every use of money, fiat money will lose its value. This would have two effects: First, prices would have to be expressed in some other unit of account. Second, the government would be unable to raise any revenue from seigniorage. If the government still wishes to maintain fiat money as a unit of account or a means of revenue, it must force people to hold fiat money.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

WHEN FIAT MONEY is not the only form of money, the monetary authority may wish to regulate money-creating institutions in order to control the total stock of money or to enhance revenue from seigniorage. To meet these ends, the monetary authority, which now may also be called a central bank, generally has two tools at its disposal—reserve requirements and loans to banks—in addition to its ability to print fiat money. In this chapter, we study the effects of each. We also ask in this chapter and the next whether control of the total money stock is always a worthwhile objective of the monetary authority. Legal Restrictions on Financial Intermediation Financial intermediation allows privately created assets to serve as money. One consequence of permitting unfettered intermediation is that if intermediation is not too costly to use and operate, people may choose to use inside money instead of fiat money. This will occur if the rate of return of inside money—net of transaction costs—exceeds that of government-created fiat money. If people prefer inside money to fiat money for every use of money, fiat money will lose its value. This would have two effects: First, prices would have to be expressed in some other unit of account. Second, the government would be unable to raise any revenue from seigniorage. If the government still wishes to maintain fiat money as a unit of account or a means of revenue, it must force people to hold fiat money.

Key concepts: Seigniorage, Money supply, Fiat money, Monetary economics, Money creation, Demand deposit, Stock (firearms), Endogenous money

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Central Banking and the Money Supply — Research Paper | ScholarLens