2015IEEE Transactions on Plasma ScienceRequires access

Simulation and Analysis of Spacecraft Charging Using SPIS and NASCAP/GEO

Jean-Charles Matéo‐Vélez, Brigitte Theillaumas, Marc Sevoz, Bjarne Andersson, Thomas Nilsson, Pierre Sarrailh, B. Thiébault, Benjamin Jeanty-Ruard, David J. Rodgers, Nicolas Balcon, D. Payan

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Spacecraft charging in GEO particularly concerns dielectric surfaces that may charge to significant voltages relative to spacecraft ground because of the space environment. Testing materials helps to define the level of risk and to maintain confidence in a spacecraft's immunity to damaging effects. Another factor defining the risk involves numerical simulation of spacecraft charging. Several tools aim to calculate surface charging, which is particularly hazardous in harsh environments produced by geomagnetic sub storms, where particles in the energy range of a few to hundreds of kiloelectronvolts are present. The main codes include Nascap-2k, Spacecraft plasma Interaction Software (SPIS), MUSCAT, and Coulomb-2. They use different numerical and sometimes physical models and cross checking their results is a necessary process to achieve better confidence in simulations performed by spacecraft prime manufacturers. The objective of this paper is to simulate different GEO spacecraft configurations with NASA Charging Analyzer Program at geosynchronous orbits (a 1980s to 1990s predecessor to Nascap-2k) and SPIS and to compare the results, both in terms of absolute and differential potentials. The first section concerns the SCATHA spacecraft. The second part of this paper compares efforts to model a modern telecom spacecraft. Finally, we conclude on the reliability of the simulations performed and possible areas for modeling improvement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Spacecraft charging in GEO particularly concerns dielectric surfaces that may charge to significant voltages relative to spacecraft ground because of the space environment. Testing materials helps to define the level of risk and to maintain confidence in a spacecraft's immunity to damaging effects. Another factor defining the risk involves numerical simulation of spacecraft charging. Several tools aim to calculate surface charging, which is particularly hazardous in harsh environments produced by geomagnetic sub storms, where particles in the energy range of a few to hundreds of kiloelectronvolts are present. The main codes include Nascap-2k, Spacecraft plasma Interaction Software (SPIS), MUSCAT, and Coulomb-2. They use different numerical and sometimes physical models and cross checking their results is a necessary process to achieve better confidence in simulations performed by spacecraft prime manufacturers. The objective of this paper is to simulate different GEO spacecraft configurations with NASA Charging Analyzer Program at geosynchronous orbits (a 1980s to 1990s predecessor to Nascap-2k) and SPIS and to compare the results, both in terms of absolute and differential potentials. The first section concerns the SCATHA spacecraft. The second part of this paper compares efforts to model a modern telecom spacecraft. Finally, we conclude on the reliability of the simulations performed and possible areas for modeling improvement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Spacecraft charging in GEO particularly concerns dielectric surfaces that may charge to significant voltages relative to spacecraft ground because of the space environment. Testing materials helps to define the level of risk and to maintain confidence in a spacecraft's immunity to damaging effects. Another factor defining the risk involves numerical simulation of spacecraft charging. Several tools aim to calculate surface charging, which is particularly hazardous in harsh environments produced by geomagnetic sub storms, where particles in the energy range of a few to hundreds of kiloelectronvolts are present. The main codes include Nascap-2k, Spacecraft plasma Interaction Software (SPIS), MUSCAT, and Coulomb-2. They use different numerical and sometimes physical models and cross checking their results is a necessary process to achieve better confidence in simulations performed by spacecraft prime manufacturers. The objective of this paper is to simulate different GEO spacecraft configurations with NASA Charging Analyzer Program at geosynchronous orbits (a 1980s to 1990s predecessor to Nascap-2k) and SPIS and to compare the results, both in terms of absolute and differential potentials. The first section concerns the SCATHA spacecraft. The second part of this paper compares efforts to model a modern telecom spacecraft. Finally, we conclude on the reliability of the simulations performed and possible areas for modeling improvement.

Key concepts: Spacecraft, Spacecraft charging, Geosynchronous orbit, Aerospace engineering, Computer science, Range (aeronautics), Physics, Satellite

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simulation and Analysis of Spacecraft Charging Using SPIS and NASCAP/GEO — Research Paper | ScholarLens