2004Digitalni Knihovna - Knihovna Akademie věd ČRRequires access

Evaluation of Reference Evapotranspiration Calculation Methods Applied to the Climatic Conditions of Turkey

Üstün Şahin, İlker Angin, Omer Anapalii

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the possible use of evapotranspiration estimation (combination) methods under different climatic conditions of Turkey. Reference evapotranspiration values were calculated according to Penman (1963; Original wind function), FAO-24 Corrected Penman, Penman (Daytime wind speed), Kimberly–Penman (1972), Kimberly–Penman (1982), FAO-PPP-17, Penman (Merva-Fernandez), Penman–Monteith and Penman–Monteith (FAO) for selected 20 locations with different climatic conditions. Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) assessments were analyzed according to their annually, 8 monthly (March–October) and 3 monthly (June–August) values. In all periods evaluated, almost the same significant differences (P<0.01) were found between locations and methods. High ET0 values were obtained in the locations with high wind speed and low relative humidity. Low ET0 values were observed in the locations with low daily sunshine duration. In conclusion, FAO-PPP-17, Penman (Merva-Fernandez), Penman-Monteith and Penman-Monteith (FAO) could be more efficiently used. Penman (Daytime wind speed) and FAO-24 Corrected Penman over-predicted ET0 values as compared to other methods.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study was carried out to determine the possible use of evapotranspiration estimation (combination) methods under different climatic conditions of Turkey. Reference evapotranspiration values were calculated according to Penman (1963; Original wind function), FAO-24 Corrected Penman, Penman (Daytime wind speed), Kimberly–Penman (1972), Kimberly–Penman (1982), FAO-PPP-17, Penman (Merva-Fernandez), Penman–Monteith and Penman–Monteith (FAO) for selected 20 locations with different climatic conditions. Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) assessments were analyzed according to their annually, 8 monthly (March–October) and 3 monthly (June–August) values. In all periods evaluated, almost the same significant differences (P<0.01) were found between locations and methods. High ET0 values were obtained in the locations with high wind speed and low relative humidity. Low ET0 values were observed in the locations with low daily sunshine duration. In conclusion, FAO-PPP-17, Penman (Merva-Fernandez), Penman-Monteith and Penman-Monteith (FAO) could be more efficiently used. Penman (Daytime wind speed) and FAO-24 Corrected Penman over-predicted ET0 values as compared to other methods.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study was carried out to determine the possible use of evapotranspiration estimation (combination) methods under different climatic conditions of Turkey. Reference evapotranspiration values were calculated according to Penman (1963; Original wind function), FAO-24 Corrected Penman, Penman (Daytime wind speed), Kimberly–Penman (1972), Kimberly–Penman (1982), FAO-PPP-17, Penman (Merva-Fernandez), Penman–Monteith and Penman–Monteith (FAO) for selected 20 locations with different climatic conditions. Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) assessments were analyzed according to their annually, 8 monthly (March–October) and 3 monthly (June–August) values. In all periods evaluated, almost the same significant differences (P<0.01) were found between locations and methods. High ET0 values were obtained in the locations with high wind speed and low relative humidity. Low ET0 values were observed in the locations with low daily sunshine duration. In conclusion, FAO-PPP-17, Penman (Merva-Fernandez), Penman-Monteith and Penman-Monteith (FAO) could be more efficiently used. Penman (Daytime wind speed) and FAO-24 Corrected Penman over-predicted ET0 values as compared to other methods.

Key concepts: Evapotranspiration, Penman–Monteith equation, Wind speed, Sunshine duration, Environmental science, Daytime, Relative humidity, Meteorology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Reference Evapotranspiration Calculation Methods Applied to the Climatic Conditions of Turkey — Research Paper | ScholarLens