2009•Open Research Online (The Open University)Requires access

A nodes model for creativity in mathematics education

James Clack

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper sets outs a proposition for a model of understanding creativity in the mathematics classroom. It aims to show that creativity in mathematics can be conceptualised as the mental processes involved in ‘meaning making’ in the mathematics classroom. It is currently primarily a conceptual exploration, with only preliminary empirical investigation, however it is hoped that this is to be addressed in the coming academic year. The paper comes from more formal conceptual development of an informal discussion about what creativity in mathematics actually is between the author and a number of researchers at University of Durham. A variety of ideas were put forward, and while there was little consensus on what creativity in mathematics is, there was agreement on what creativity in mathematics is not – creativity in mathematics is not about making classroom mathematics ‘shiny’. While colourful displays and beautifully drawn graphs were useful in themselves, this did not, the group concluded, constitute creativity in mathematics. Similarly, while setting project work could be considered creativity in mathematics it wasn’t necessarily. It was agreed that there was something more fundamental about what creativity in mathematics may be. This nodes model takes one of the ideas discussed and is an attempt to describe what this ‘more fundamental’ aspect may be.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper sets outs a proposition for a model of understanding creativity in the mathematics classroom. It aims to show that creativity in mathematics can be conceptualised as the mental processes involved in ‘meaning making’ in the mathematics classroom. It is currently primarily a conceptual exploration, with only preliminary empirical investigation, however it is hoped that this is to be addressed in the coming academic year. The paper comes from more formal conceptual development of an informal discussion about what creativity in mathematics actually is between the author and a number of researchers at University of Durham. A variety of ideas were put forward, and while there was little consensus on what creativity in mathematics is, there was agreement on what creativity in mathematics is not – creativity in mathematics is not about making classroom mathematics ‘shiny’. While colourful displays and beautifully drawn graphs were useful in themselves, this did not, the group concluded, constitute creativity in mathematics. Similarly, while setting project work could be considered creativity in mathematics it wasn’t necessarily. It was agreed that there was something more fundamental about what creativity in mathematics may be. This nodes model takes one of the ideas discussed and is an attempt to describe what this ‘more fundamental’ aspect may be.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper sets outs a proposition for a model of understanding creativity in the mathematics classroom. It aims to show that creativity in mathematics can be conceptualised as the mental processes involved in ‘meaning making’ in the mathematics classroom. It is currently primarily a conceptual exploration, with only preliminary empirical investigation, however it is hoped that this is to be addressed in the coming academic year. The paper comes from more formal conceptual development of an informal discussion about what creativity in mathematics actually is between the author and a number of researchers at University of Durham. A variety of ideas were put forward, and while there was little consensus on what creativity in mathematics is, there was agreement on what creativity in mathematics is not – creativity in mathematics is not about making classroom mathematics ‘shiny’. While colourful displays and beautifully drawn graphs were useful in themselves, this did not, the group concluded, constitute creativity in mathematics. Similarly, while setting project work could be considered creativity in mathematics it wasn’t necessarily. It was agreed that there was something more fundamental about what creativity in mathematics may be. This nodes model takes one of the ideas discussed and is an attempt to describe what this ‘more fundamental’ aspect may be.

Key concepts: Creativity, Mathematics education, Creativity technique, Meaning (existential), Proposition, Mathematics, Pedagogy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A nodes model for creativity in mathematics education — Research Paper | ScholarLens