2010•Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University)Open access

Title VII, Voluntary Compliance and Ricci: Rescuing Municipalities From a Legal ‘Backdraft’

Jared D. Stueckle

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The Supreme Court recently decided Ricci v. DeStefano, a case that had municipalities throughout the United States holding their breath.This case presents a scenario where either action by a municipal employer would result in potential liability under Title VII.Thus, the policy goal of Title VII-encouraging the voluntary compliance of employers by relaxing standards for liability when these attempts are made in good faith-is in danger of being undermined.This note examines both sides of this issue in light of the policy goals of Title VII.The note then delves into the background of the case, analyzes the legal claims made by both parties, and then analyzes the Supreme Court's ruling.possible outcomes of this case and the potential impact of these outcomes on similar future situations.Finally, the article asks whether the Court is able to find an appropriate middle-ground and how the Court's new standard will be affect future litigation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Supreme Court recently decided Ricci v. DeStefano, a case that had municipalities throughout the United States holding their breath.This case presents a scenario where either action by a municipal employer would result in potential liability under Title VII.Thus, the policy goal of Title VII-encouraging the voluntary compliance of employers by relaxing standards for liability when these attempts are made in good faith-is in danger of being undermined.This note examines both sides of this issue in light of the policy goals of Title VII.The note then delves into the background of the case, analyzes the legal claims made by both parties, and then analyzes the Supreme Court's ruling.possible outcomes of this case and the potential impact of these outcomes on similar future situations.Finally, the article asks whether the Court is able to find an appropriate middle-ground and how the Court's new standard will be affect future litigation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Supreme Court recently decided Ricci v. DeStefano, a case that had municipalities throughout the United States holding their breath.This case presents a scenario where either action by a municipal employer would result in potential liability under Title VII.Thus, the policy goal of Title VII-encouraging the voluntary compliance of employers by relaxing standards for liability when these attempts are made in good faith-is in danger of being undermined.This note examines both sides of this issue in light of the policy goals of Title VII.The note then delves into the background of the case, analyzes the legal claims made by both parties, and then analyzes the Supreme Court's ruling.possible outcomes of this case and the potential impact of these outcomes on similar future situations.Finally, the article asks whether the Court is able to find an appropriate middle-ground and how the Court's new standard will be affect future litigation.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Haven, Liability, Promotion (chess), Business, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Title VII, Voluntary Compliance and Ricci: Rescuing Municipalities From a Legal ‘Backdraft’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens