1971The Bell Journal of Economics and Management ScienceRequires access

A New Theory of Pricing and Decision-Making for Public Investment

Edna T. Loehman, Andrew B. Whinston

Open publisher page 62 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a theory for price-setting in public utilities, of which public goods will be considered a special case. Both public goods and utilities are cases of joint supplies and costs, where a good is to be supplied to and paid for by several users, and any increase in the quantity of the good is equally available to all users. The pricing system proposed will be based on the idea of each user's paying the social incremental costs due to his demands. To a certain extent, Coase proposed a similar idea, but it was not worked out except in special cases. The concept has been difficult to apply due to problems in defining incremental cost when there are joint costs. A meaningful definition of social incremental cost will be given here. Where the classical assumptions hold, our theory reduces to marginal-cost pricing; however, in the case of decreasing costs, results different from marginal-cost pricing are obtained. Since users may have quite different demands, incremental-cost charges will not be uniform. However, the incremental-cost system does posses certain equity properties. Furthermore, this system of charges will cover the complete costs of supplying a public service. Finally, the concept of incremental cost implies that, at the optimum investment, the marginal unit should be charged marginal cost, which is the condition necessary for welfare maximization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a theory for price-setting in public utilities, of which public goods will be considered a special case. Both public goods and utilities are cases of joint supplies and costs, where a good is to be supplied to and paid for by several users, and any increase in the quantity of the good is equally available to all users. The pricing system proposed will be based on the idea of each user's paying the social incremental costs due to his demands. To a certain extent, Coase proposed a similar idea, but it was not worked out except in special cases. The concept has been difficult to apply due to problems in defining incremental cost when there are joint costs. A meaningful definition of social incremental cost will be given here. Where the classical assumptions hold, our theory reduces to marginal-cost pricing; however, in the case of decreasing costs, results different from marginal-cost pricing are obtained. Since users may have quite different demands, incremental-cost charges will not be uniform. However, the incremental-cost system does posses certain equity properties. Furthermore, this system of charges will cover the complete costs of supplying a public service. Finally, the concept of incremental cost implies that, at the optimum investment, the marginal unit should be charged marginal cost, which is the condition necessary for welfare maximization.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 62 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a theory for price-setting in public utilities, of which public goods will be considered a special case. Both public goods and utilities are cases of joint supplies and costs, where a good is to be supplied to and paid for by several users, and any increase in the quantity of the good is equally available to all users. The pricing system proposed will be based on the idea of each user's paying the social incremental costs due to his demands. To a certain extent, Coase proposed a similar idea, but it was not worked out except in special cases. The concept has been difficult to apply due to problems in defining incremental cost when there are joint costs. A meaningful definition of social incremental cost will be given here. Where the classical assumptions hold, our theory reduces to marginal-cost pricing; however, in the case of decreasing costs, results different from marginal-cost pricing are obtained. Since users may have quite different demands, incremental-cost charges will not be uniform. However, the incremental-cost system does posses certain equity properties. Furthermore, this system of charges will cover the complete costs of supplying a public service. Finally, the concept of incremental cost implies that, at the optimum investment, the marginal unit should be charged marginal cost, which is the condition necessary for welfare maximization.

Key concepts: Economics, Investment (military), Decision theory, Investment theory, Public investment, Positive economics, Financial economics, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A New Theory of Pricing and Decision-Making for Public Investment — Research Paper | ScholarLens