1979PubMedOpen access

Comparison between general and local anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias.

T Makuria, J Alexander-Williams, M R B Keighley

Open full text 30 citations

Abstract

A prospective study of 104 cases has been carried out to compare the use of local and general anaesthesia for the elective repair of groin hernias. There were no apparent disadvantages in using a local anaesthetic procedure. Patients having local anaesthetic herniorrhaphy required postoperative analgesics and antiemetics significantly less often and also returned home sooner (3.2 days) than patients having a general anaesthetic (4.1 days). These findings argue strongly in favour of local anaesthesia as a suitable alternative to general anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A prospective study of 104 cases has been carried out to compare the use of local and general anaesthesia for the elective repair of groin hernias. There were no apparent disadvantages in using a local anaesthetic procedure. Patients having local anaesthetic herniorrhaphy required postoperative analgesics and antiemetics significantly less often and also returned home sooner (3.2 days) than patients having a general anaesthetic (4.1 days). These findings argue strongly in favour of local anaesthesia as a suitable alternative to general anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A prospective study of 104 cases has been carried out to compare the use of local and general anaesthesia for the elective repair of groin hernias. There were no apparent disadvantages in using a local anaesthetic procedure. Patients having local anaesthetic herniorrhaphy required postoperative analgesics and antiemetics significantly less often and also returned home sooner (3.2 days) than patients having a general anaesthetic (4.1 days). These findings argue strongly in favour of local anaesthesia as a suitable alternative to general anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias.

Key concepts: Medicine, Groin, Local anaesthetic, General anaesthesia, General anaesthetic, Anesthesia, Regional anaesthesia, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between general and local anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias. — Research Paper | ScholarLens