2014Review of European Comparative & International Environmental LawRequires access

Environment Playing Short‐handed: Margin of Appreciation in Environmental Jurisprudence of the E uropean Court of Human Rights

Hana Műllerová

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The European Court of Human Rights established the interpretative doctrine of margin of appreciation to support the subsidiarity principle underlying the whole system of the Council of Europe. Despite not being well accepted by theorists, the doctrine has found its way into many rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. This article analyzes how the Court applies the margin of appreciation in environment‐related cases, based on Article 8 of the Convention. The objective is to uncover how the wide margin of appreciation granted to States in environmental matters impacts on the environment. In that regard, the methods of the Court in hearing environmental cases and their results are examined. Special attention is paid to how the Court balances the competing interests within the fair balance assessment and how it evaluates whether the respondent State exceeded the margin of appreciation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The European Court of Human Rights established the interpretative doctrine of margin of appreciation to support the subsidiarity principle underlying the whole system of the Council of Europe. Despite not being well accepted by theorists, the doctrine has found its way into many rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. This article analyzes how the Court applies the margin of appreciation in environment‐related cases, based on Article 8 of the Convention. The objective is to uncover how the wide margin of appreciation granted to States in environmental matters impacts on the environment. In that regard, the methods of the Court in hearing environmental cases and their results are examined. Special attention is paid to how the Court balances the competing interests within the fair balance assessment and how it evaluates whether the respondent State exceeded the margin of appreciation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The European Court of Human Rights established the interpretative doctrine of margin of appreciation to support the subsidiarity principle underlying the whole system of the Council of Europe. Despite not being well accepted by theorists, the doctrine has found its way into many rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. This article analyzes how the Court applies the margin of appreciation in environment‐related cases, based on Article 8 of the Convention. The objective is to uncover how the wide margin of appreciation granted to States in environmental matters impacts on the environment. In that regard, the methods of the Court in hearing environmental cases and their results are examined. Special attention is paid to how the Court balances the competing interests within the fair balance assessment and how it evaluates whether the respondent State exceeded the margin of appreciation.

Key concepts: Margin of appreciation, Subsidiarity, Doctrine, Jurisprudence, Respondent, Human rights, Convention, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Environment Playing Short‐handed: Margin of Appreciation in Environmental Jurisprudence of the E uropean Court of Human Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens