2005RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

New Keynesian Models and the test of Kydland and Prescott

Juan Páez‐Farrell

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A benchmark New Keynesian model is assessed using Real Business Cycle methods. This paper evaluates New Keynesian models using RBC methods for a number of key macroeconomic variables to determine whether these models are able to replicate the comovements found in the data. Its main findings are that the New Keynesian model and alternative variants struggle to replicate key business cycle properties for nominal variables. This result is poses a challenge for models currently used for monetary policy and business cycle analysis and is puzzling, given their success in replicating impulse response functions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A benchmark New Keynesian model is assessed using Real Business Cycle methods. This paper evaluates New Keynesian models using RBC methods for a number of key macroeconomic variables to determine whether these models are able to replicate the comovements found in the data. Its main findings are that the New Keynesian model and alternative variants struggle to replicate key business cycle properties for nominal variables. This result is poses a challenge for models currently used for monetary policy and business cycle analysis and is puzzling, given their success in replicating impulse response functions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A benchmark New Keynesian model is assessed using Real Business Cycle methods. This paper evaluates New Keynesian models using RBC methods for a number of key macroeconomic variables to determine whether these models are able to replicate the comovements found in the data. Its main findings are that the New Keynesian model and alternative variants struggle to replicate key business cycle properties for nominal variables. This result is poses a challenge for models currently used for monetary policy and business cycle analysis and is puzzling, given their success in replicating impulse response functions.

Key concepts: Replicate, Business cycle, New Keynesian economics, Benchmark (surveying), Economics, Keynesian economics, Monetary policy, Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New Keynesian Models and the test of Kydland and Prescott — Research Paper | ScholarLens