New Keynesian Models and the test of Kydland and Prescott
Juan Páez‐Farrell
Abstract
Open-access reader
Juan Páez‐Farrell
Abstract
Open-access reader
A benchmark New Keynesian model is assessed using Real Business Cycle methods. This paper evaluates New Keynesian models using RBC methods for a number of key macroeconomic variables to determine whether these models are able to replicate the comovements found in the data. Its main findings are that the New Keynesian model and alternative variants struggle to replicate key business cycle properties for nominal variables. This result is poses a challenge for models currently used for monetary policy and business cycle analysis and is puzzling, given their success in replicating impulse response functions.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A benchmark New Keynesian model is assessed using Real Business Cycle methods. This paper evaluates New Keynesian models using RBC methods for a number of key macroeconomic variables to determine whether these models are able to replicate the comovements found in the data. Its main findings are that the New Keynesian model and alternative variants struggle to replicate key business cycle properties for nominal variables. This result is poses a challenge for models currently used for monetary policy and business cycle analysis and is puzzling, given their success in replicating impulse response functions.
Key concepts: Replicate, Business cycle, New Keynesian economics, Benchmark (surveying), Economics, Keynesian economics, Monetary policy, Econometrics