2002Transport Research ForumRequires access

PROMOTING THE USE OF RAIL FREIGHT SERVICES

M M Starrs, T Van Geldermalsen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper considers the policy alternatives by reference to some schemes in other countries and a case study in Victoria. Freight is largely provided within a competitive model by private transport companies which means that commercial considerations drive investments. This is not the case for road infrastructure which is assessed on an economic basis. This may lead to inconsistency in the treatment of rail and road and mean that freight is not carried on the lowest cost mode. These factors appear to provide a justification for some government intervention including financial support to rail freight operators to enable them to win traffic from trucks. The matters covered in the paper include discussion of who should receive financial support, access to infrastructure provided, how the level of any financial support should be determined (for example the determination of economic worth, returns from the financial support, the community benefits of the removing freight from road to rail), and the mechanisms for the delivery of any support payments. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E209537.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper considers the policy alternatives by reference to some schemes in other countries and a case study in Victoria. Freight is largely provided within a competitive model by private transport companies which means that commercial considerations drive investments. This is not the case for road infrastructure which is assessed on an economic basis. This may lead to inconsistency in the treatment of rail and road and mean that freight is not carried on the lowest cost mode. These factors appear to provide a justification for some government intervention including financial support to rail freight operators to enable them to win traffic from trucks. The matters covered in the paper include discussion of who should receive financial support, access to infrastructure provided, how the level of any financial support should be determined (for example the determination of economic worth, returns from the financial support, the community benefits of the removing freight from road to rail), and the mechanisms for the delivery of any support payments. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E209537.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper considers the policy alternatives by reference to some schemes in other countries and a case study in Victoria. Freight is largely provided within a competitive model by private transport companies which means that commercial considerations drive investments. This is not the case for road infrastructure which is assessed on an economic basis. This may lead to inconsistency in the treatment of rail and road and mean that freight is not carried on the lowest cost mode. These factors appear to provide a justification for some government intervention including financial support to rail freight operators to enable them to win traffic from trucks. The matters covered in the paper include discussion of who should receive financial support, access to infrastructure provided, how the level of any financial support should be determined (for example the determination of economic worth, returns from the financial support, the community benefits of the removing freight from road to rail), and the mechanisms for the delivery of any support payments. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E209537.

Key concepts: Truck, Transport engineering, Payment, Finance, Business, Government (linguistics), Traffic management, Intervention (counseling)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PROMOTING THE USE OF RAIL FREIGHT SERVICES — Research Paper | ScholarLens