The moon as a gravitational wave detector, using seismometers
Warren W. Johnson
Abstract
Warren W. Johnson
Abstract
For most searches for gravitational waves, a lunar base does not have a compelling advantage over earth‐bound or earth‐orbit bases. The exception might be searches for known, predictable continuous wave sources with frequencies in the milliHertz region, which would use long period seismometers to detect the mechanical response of the whole moon both on and off its quadrupole resonance. An estimate of the two simplest sources of instrument noise indicates that an interesting sensitivity is tough but possible. Seismic noise is very uncertain, but might be prohibitive, in which case the network could turn to seismic studies.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For most searches for gravitational waves, a lunar base does not have a compelling advantage over earth‐bound or earth‐orbit bases. The exception might be searches for known, predictable continuous wave sources with frequencies in the milliHertz region, which would use long period seismometers to detect the mechanical response of the whole moon both on and off its quadrupole resonance. An estimate of the two simplest sources of instrument noise indicates that an interesting sensitivity is tough but possible. Seismic noise is very uncertain, but might be prohibitive, in which case the network could turn to seismic studies.
Key concepts: Seismometer, Seismic noise, Noise (video), Detector, Gravitational wave, Sensitivity (control systems), Physics, Seismology