1968•Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Relationships among Performance Traits of Grade Hereford Bulls

W. T. Magee, Robert A. Merkel, Lyman J. Bratzler, Albert M. PEARSON, Kenneth E. Kemp

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The data from 100 bulls produced in the Michigan Beef Cattle Breeding Project were used to evaluate the relationship among performance traits of yearling bulls. Percent preferred cuts (trimmed wholesale loin and round) was influenced by carcass weight, the regression was −.005% per kg. of carcass weight. Percent preferred cuts adjusted for carcass weight was not closely associated with loin-eye area (correlations ranged from 0.04 and 0.33). Adjusted percent preferred cuts was negatively correlated with tenderness index (r=−.24 to −.38). Weight of preferred cuts was highly correlated with carcass weight (r=0.95 or higher). The correlations between percent round and percent loin were low (r=−.06 to 0.23 on a total carcass basis). There was a higher correlation between percent round (r=0.57 to 0.89) than between percent loin from the two sides (r=−.23 to 0.66). Variance in percent round was about four times as important as variance in percent loin in determining percent preferred cuts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The data from 100 bulls produced in the Michigan Beef Cattle Breeding Project were used to evaluate the relationship among performance traits of yearling bulls. Percent preferred cuts (trimmed wholesale loin and round) was influenced by carcass weight, the regression was −.005% per kg. of carcass weight. Percent preferred cuts adjusted for carcass weight was not closely associated with loin-eye area (correlations ranged from 0.04 and 0.33). Adjusted percent preferred cuts was negatively correlated with tenderness index (r=−.24 to −.38). Weight of preferred cuts was highly correlated with carcass weight (r=0.95 or higher). The correlations between percent round and percent loin were low (r=−.06 to 0.23 on a total carcass basis). There was a higher correlation between percent round (r=0.57 to 0.89) than between percent loin from the two sides (r=−.23 to 0.66). Variance in percent round was about four times as important as variance in percent loin in determining percent preferred cuts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The data from 100 bulls produced in the Michigan Beef Cattle Breeding Project were used to evaluate the relationship among performance traits of yearling bulls. Percent preferred cuts (trimmed wholesale loin and round) was influenced by carcass weight, the regression was −.005% per kg. of carcass weight. Percent preferred cuts adjusted for carcass weight was not closely associated with loin-eye area (correlations ranged from 0.04 and 0.33). Adjusted percent preferred cuts was negatively correlated with tenderness index (r=−.24 to −.38). Weight of preferred cuts was highly correlated with carcass weight (r=0.95 or higher). The correlations between percent round and percent loin were low (r=−.06 to 0.23 on a total carcass basis). There was a higher correlation between percent round (r=0.57 to 0.89) than between percent loin from the two sides (r=−.23 to 0.66). Variance in percent round was about four times as important as variance in percent loin in determining percent preferred cuts.

Key concepts: Loin, Carcass weight, Animal science, Tenderness, Biology, Body weight, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relationships among Performance Traits of Grade Hereford Bulls — Research Paper | ScholarLens