2015•University of North Carolina School of Law Scholarship Repository (University of North Carolina Hospitals)Open access

Two Hats, One Head, No Heart: The Anatomy of the ERISA Settlor/Fiduciary Distinction

Dana M. Muir, Norman P. Stein

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Congress enacted ERISA, the comprehensive employee benefits reform statute, in 1974.ERISA created a strict fiduciary standard for those involved in the administration or management of employee benefit plans or their assets, a standard that requires such actors to make decisions solely in the interests of the plan's participants and their beneficiaries.The Department of Labor and the federal courts, however, have held that employer decisions on whether to adopt or terminate a plan, or how to design the provisions of a plan, are plan "settlor" functions, akin to a grantor's design of a trust under the common law, and thus not subject to ERISA's fiduciary duties.Courts have used this distinction between "settlor" and "fiduciary" functions to recognize the employer's own interests in employee benefit plans and to mediate between

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Congress enacted ERISA, the comprehensive employee benefits reform statute, in 1974.ERISA created a strict fiduciary standard for those involved in the administration or management of employee benefit plans or their assets, a standard that requires such actors to make decisions solely in the interests of the plan's participants and their beneficiaries.The Department of Labor and the federal courts, however, have held that employer decisions on whether to adopt or terminate a plan, or how to design the provisions of a plan, are plan "settlor" functions, akin to a grantor's design of a trust under the common law, and thus not subject to ERISA's fiduciary duties.Courts have used this distinction between "settlor" and "fiduciary" functions to recognize the employer's own interests in employee benefit plans and to mediate between

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Congress enacted ERISA, the comprehensive employee benefits reform statute, in 1974.ERISA created a strict fiduciary standard for those involved in the administration or management of employee benefit plans or their assets, a standard that requires such actors to make decisions solely in the interests of the plan's participants and their beneficiaries.The Department of Labor and the federal courts, however, have held that employer decisions on whether to adopt or terminate a plan, or how to design the provisions of a plan, are plan "settlor" functions, akin to a grantor's design of a trust under the common law, and thus not subject to ERISA's fiduciary duties.Courts have used this distinction between "settlor" and "fiduciary" functions to recognize the employer's own interests in employee benefit plans and to mediate between

Key concepts: Fiduciary, Settlor, Head (geology), Business, Cardiology, Medicine, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two Hats, One Head, No Heart: The Anatomy of the ERISA Settlor/Fiduciary Distinction — Research Paper | ScholarLens