2002•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Nonexperimental Replications of Social Experiments A Systematic Review Interim ReportDiscussion Paper

Steven Glazerman

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Reports initial findings from a synthesis and reanalysis of all available evidence on whether quasi-experimental evaluation designs produced unbiased estimates of the impacts of education, training, and welfare programs. This methodological paper tries to understand conditions under which quasi-experimental methods can lead to the same conclusion as a well-designed and well-executed randomized experiment. It has practical implications for the design of new evaluation research and synthesis of existing evidence on the effectiveness of social programs.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Reports initial findings from a synthesis and reanalysis of all available evidence on whether quasi-experimental evaluation designs produced unbiased estimates of the impacts of education, training, and welfare programs. This methodological paper tries to understand conditions under which quasi-experimental methods can lead to the same conclusion as a well-designed and well-executed randomized experiment. It has practical implications for the design of new evaluation research and synthesis of existing evidence on the effectiveness of social programs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Reports initial findings from a synthesis and reanalysis of all available evidence on whether quasi-experimental evaluation designs produced unbiased estimates of the impacts of education, training, and welfare programs. This methodological paper tries to understand conditions under which quasi-experimental methods can lead to the same conclusion as a well-designed and well-executed randomized experiment. It has practical implications for the design of new evaluation research and synthesis of existing evidence on the effectiveness of social programs.

Key concepts: Interim, Welfare, Randomized experiment, Computer science, Social Welfare, Psychology, Econometrics, Management science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nonexperimental Replications of Social Experiments A Systematic Review Interim ReportDiscussion Paper — Research Paper | ScholarLens