Nonexperimental Replications of Social Experiments A Systematic Review Interim ReportDiscussion Paper
Steven Glazerman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Steven Glazerman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Reports initial findings from a synthesis and reanalysis of all available evidence on whether quasi-experimental evaluation designs produced unbiased estimates of the impacts of education, training, and welfare programs. This methodological paper tries to understand conditions under which quasi-experimental methods can lead to the same conclusion as a well-designed and well-executed randomized experiment. It has practical implications for the design of new evaluation research and synthesis of existing evidence on the effectiveness of social programs.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Reports initial findings from a synthesis and reanalysis of all available evidence on whether quasi-experimental evaluation designs produced unbiased estimates of the impacts of education, training, and welfare programs. This methodological paper tries to understand conditions under which quasi-experimental methods can lead to the same conclusion as a well-designed and well-executed randomized experiment. It has practical implications for the design of new evaluation research and synthesis of existing evidence on the effectiveness of social programs.
Key concepts: Interim, Welfare, Randomized experiment, Computer science, Social Welfare, Psychology, Econometrics, Management science