1991Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Banking competition and European integration

Xavier Vives

Open publisher page 91 citations

Abstract

Introduction European integration poses a challenge to the study of competition in banking and financial markets. The Price Waterhouse (PW) study for the European Commission on the ‘costs of non-Europe’ in financial markets concluded that important welfare gains could be attained by the increase in competition which would accompany financial integration. This study has been much debated and criticized on the grounds that it overestimates the gains to be obtained by assuming that integration will lead to a competitive market. The crucial issue seems to be the impact of the process under way on the degree of competition in banking, and more particularly in retail banking, where the effects are likely to be the largest. Many other questions revolve around this issue: Will deregulation induce excessive competition? How will the benefits of integration be distributed? What specific predictions on conduct and market structure, trade and direct investment can be made? How will the stability of the financial system be affected? Are the regulations to be implemented consistent? In the present paper I try to draw some lessons from recent research in finance, banking and industrial organization on how competition will be affected by the integration process. This is not an easy task since at a theoretical level financial intermediation is still not well understood, and competition among financial intermediaries even less so. Any attempt to understand the way financial institutions compete must start by examining the role of financial intermediaries, the potential for market failure and the need for regulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction European integration poses a challenge to the study of competition in banking and financial markets. The Price Waterhouse (PW) study for the European Commission on the ‘costs of non-Europe’ in financial markets concluded that important welfare gains could be attained by the increase in competition which would accompany financial integration. This study has been much debated and criticized on the grounds that it overestimates the gains to be obtained by assuming that integration will lead to a competitive market. The crucial issue seems to be the impact of the process under way on the degree of competition in banking, and more particularly in retail banking, where the effects are likely to be the largest. Many other questions revolve around this issue: Will deregulation induce excessive competition? How will the benefits of integration be distributed? What specific predictions on conduct and market structure, trade and direct investment can be made? How will the stability of the financial system be affected? Are the regulations to be implemented consistent? In the present paper I try to draw some lessons from recent research in finance, banking and industrial organization on how competition will be affected by the integration process. This is not an easy task since at a theoretical level financial intermediation is still not well understood, and competition among financial intermediaries even less so. Any attempt to understand the way financial institutions compete must start by examining the role of financial intermediaries, the potential for market failure and the need for regulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction European integration poses a challenge to the study of competition in banking and financial markets. The Price Waterhouse (PW) study for the European Commission on the ‘costs of non-Europe’ in financial markets concluded that important welfare gains could be attained by the increase in competition which would accompany financial integration. This study has been much debated and criticized on the grounds that it overestimates the gains to be obtained by assuming that integration will lead to a competitive market. The crucial issue seems to be the impact of the process under way on the degree of competition in banking, and more particularly in retail banking, where the effects are likely to be the largest. Many other questions revolve around this issue: Will deregulation induce excessive competition? How will the benefits of integration be distributed? What specific predictions on conduct and market structure, trade and direct investment can be made? How will the stability of the financial system be affected? Are the regulations to be implemented consistent? In the present paper I try to draw some lessons from recent research in finance, banking and industrial organization on how competition will be affected by the integration process. This is not an easy task since at a theoretical level financial intermediation is still not well understood, and competition among financial intermediaries even less so. Any attempt to understand the way financial institutions compete must start by examining the role of financial intermediaries, the potential for market failure and the need for regulation.

Key concepts: Competition (biology), European commission, Financial integration, Financial market, Business, International economics, Market integration, Welfare

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Banking competition and European integration — Research Paper | ScholarLens