The Federal Circuit's Modern Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Infringement
Gregory J. Smith
Abstract
Open-access reader
Gregory J. Smith
Abstract
Open-access reader
In November 1987, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc.,' after rehearing the case en banc. 2 The Federal Circuit in Pennwalt, splitting seven to four, affirmed the district court's finding of no infringement.In doing so, the Pennwalt majority approved some rules of analysis under the doctrine of equivalents 3 that drew a sharp dissent from Judge Bennett, 4 a harsh criticism of the majority's
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In November 1987, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc.,' after rehearing the case en banc. 2 The Federal Circuit in Pennwalt, splitting seven to four, affirmed the district court's finding of no infringement.In doing so, the Pennwalt majority approved some rules of analysis under the doctrine of equivalents 3 that drew a sharp dissent from Judge Bennett, 4 a harsh criticism of the majority's
Key concepts: Patent infringement, Doctrine, Law, Business, Law and economics, Political science, Economics, Intellectual property