2005ITE journalRequires access

Traffic Calming Practice Revisited

Reid Ewing, Steven J Brown, Aaron Hoyt

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

A survey of Traffic Calming Practices in 21 leading jurisdictions in Sacramento County is presented. Some of the most significant changes are mainstreaming of programs within transportation or public works departments, less apparent controversy surrounding programs, greater reliance on private financing of construction and more public involvement in planning through neighborhood traffic committees. The survey also includes limited expansion of eligibility beyond local streets to collectors and arterials and expansion of individual agency tool boxes to include a greater range of speed control measures. Practices and policies that have not changed significantly are also outlined.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A survey of Traffic Calming Practices in 21 leading jurisdictions in Sacramento County is presented. Some of the most significant changes are mainstreaming of programs within transportation or public works departments, less apparent controversy surrounding programs, greater reliance on private financing of construction and more public involvement in planning through neighborhood traffic committees. The survey also includes limited expansion of eligibility beyond local streets to collectors and arterials and expansion of individual agency tool boxes to include a greater range of speed control measures. Practices and policies that have not changed significantly are also outlined.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A survey of Traffic Calming Practices in 21 leading jurisdictions in Sacramento County is presented. Some of the most significant changes are mainstreaming of programs within transportation or public works departments, less apparent controversy surrounding programs, greater reliance on private financing of construction and more public involvement in planning through neighborhood traffic committees. The survey also includes limited expansion of eligibility beyond local streets to collectors and arterials and expansion of individual agency tool boxes to include a greater range of speed control measures. Practices and policies that have not changed significantly are also outlined.

Key concepts: Traffic calming, Agency (philosophy), Mainstreaming, Control (management), Transportation planning, Public administration, Business, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Traffic Calming Practice Revisited — Research Paper | ScholarLens