Impact of cropping system, fertility level and moisture-conservation practice on productivity, nutrient uptake, water use and profitability of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed conditions
Jagdish P. Tetarwal, Kiran Rana
Abstract
Jagdish P. Tetarwal, Kiran Rana
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on a sandy loam soil at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during rainy (kharif) season of 2003 and 2004. The treatment combinations comprised two cropping systems [pearlmillet sole (50 cm row spacing) and pearlmillet paired row (30/70 cm row spacing) + one row of mothbean] and three fertility levels (control, 40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ha and 80 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha) in main plots; and four moisture-conservation practices (no mulch, dust mulch + straw mulch, kaolin + straw mulch and farmyard manure (FYM) @ 5 t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch) in subplots. Split-plot design was followed with three replications. The planting of one row of mothbean between paired rows of pearlmillet proved superior to sole pearlmillet in respect of pearlmillet-equivalent yield (29.60 q/ha), water use and economics. Application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha as also FYM @ 5 t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch recorded significantly higher pearlmilletequivalent yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economics compared with the rest of the treatments.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A field experiment was conducted on a sandy loam soil at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during rainy (kharif) season of 2003 and 2004. The treatment combinations comprised two cropping systems [pearlmillet sole (50 cm row spacing) and pearlmillet paired row (30/70 cm row spacing) + one row of mothbean] and three fertility levels (control, 40 kg N + 20 kg P2O5/ha and 80 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha) in main plots; and four moisture-conservation practices (no mulch, dust mulch + straw mulch, kaolin + straw mulch and farmyard manure (FYM) @ 5 t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch) in subplots. Split-plot design was followed with three replications. The planting of one row of mothbean between paired rows of pearlmillet proved superior to sole pearlmillet in respect of pearlmillet-equivalent yield (29.60 q/ha), water use and economics. Application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha as also FYM @ 5 t/ha + dust mulch + straw mulch recorded significantly higher pearlmilletequivalent yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economics compared with the rest of the treatments.
Key concepts: Mulch, Agronomy, Mathematics, Straw, Pennisetum, Kharif crop, Sowing, Loam