2003Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

International Human Rights

Sean D. Murphy

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

OVERVIEW During 1999–2001, the United States played an active role in developing new treaties and instruments in the field of human rights. At the same time, the United States continued to recognize that promotion of human rights was just one component of overall U.S. foreign policy, which at times must compete with the advancement of U.S. national security and economic interests. In implementing human rights norms, the United States adhered to certain U.S. laws restricting support for foreign states engaging in human rights abuses, and critcized such states in relevant international fora. The United States issued numerous reports on human rights in a wide variety of areas, ranging from the basic annual Department of State human rights reports to more specialized reports on religious freedom, torture, and trafficking in persons. Yet the United States itself proved unwilling to pursue certain matters, such as condemnation of Turkey for Armenian genocide of the early twentieth century, where doing so complicated U.S. security relationships, and proved unwilling to regard certain international human rights norms as having the force of law in U.S. law. Such actions exposed the United States to extensive criticism in the global community, including criticism by close allies and non-governmental organizations, which culminated in 2001 with the ousting of the United States from the seat it had held on the UN Human Rights Commission since the commission's inception.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OVERVIEW During 1999–2001, the United States played an active role in developing new treaties and instruments in the field of human rights. At the same time, the United States continued to recognize that promotion of human rights was just one component of overall U.S. foreign policy, which at times must compete with the advancement of U.S. national security and economic interests. In implementing human rights norms, the United States adhered to certain U.S. laws restricting support for foreign states engaging in human rights abuses, and critcized such states in relevant international fora. The United States issued numerous reports on human rights in a wide variety of areas, ranging from the basic annual Department of State human rights reports to more specialized reports on religious freedom, torture, and trafficking in persons. Yet the United States itself proved unwilling to pursue certain matters, such as condemnation of Turkey for Armenian genocide of the early twentieth century, where doing so complicated U.S. security relationships, and proved unwilling to regard certain international human rights norms as having the force of law in U.S. law. Such actions exposed the United States to extensive criticism in the global community, including criticism by close allies and non-governmental organizations, which culminated in 2001 with the ousting of the United States from the seat it had held on the UN Human Rights Commission since the commission's inception.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OVERVIEW During 1999–2001, the United States played an active role in developing new treaties and instruments in the field of human rights. At the same time, the United States continued to recognize that promotion of human rights was just one component of overall U.S. foreign policy, which at times must compete with the advancement of U.S. national security and economic interests. In implementing human rights norms, the United States adhered to certain U.S. laws restricting support for foreign states engaging in human rights abuses, and critcized such states in relevant international fora. The United States issued numerous reports on human rights in a wide variety of areas, ranging from the basic annual Department of State human rights reports to more specialized reports on religious freedom, torture, and trafficking in persons. Yet the United States itself proved unwilling to pursue certain matters, such as condemnation of Turkey for Armenian genocide of the early twentieth century, where doing so complicated U.S. security relationships, and proved unwilling to regard certain international human rights norms as having the force of law in U.S. law. Such actions exposed the United States to extensive criticism in the global community, including criticism by close allies and non-governmental organizations, which culminated in 2001 with the ousting of the United States from the seat it had held on the UN Human Rights Commission since the commission's inception.

Key concepts: Human rights, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
International Human Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens