2008Journal of Security EducationRequires access

Public and Private Policing in Retail

Tony Zalewski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract The encroachment of alternative or private policing entities within public safety and community crime prevention has expanded to the point that private personnel greatly outnumber public police. As public resources continue to be thinly dispersed and their focus prioritised across communities, modern security providers now assume responsibility for many traditional policing functions such as surveillance of public space, protection of public buildings and “mass private property” and the investigation of internal corporate crime. Although public policing agencies tend to embrace partnerships and the concept of multi-agency approaches to prevent crime, there appears an inherent resistance to the transfer of traditional policing functions to alternative providers. This article explores the possibility whether private security personnel are able to perform traditional public policing functions including offender processing. This research considers the processing of first-offender adult shopstealers. ...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The encroachment of alternative or private policing entities within public safety and community crime prevention has expanded to the point that private personnel greatly outnumber public police. As public resources continue to be thinly dispersed and their focus prioritised across communities, modern security providers now assume responsibility for many traditional policing functions such as surveillance of public space, protection of public buildings and “mass private property” and the investigation of internal corporate crime. Although public policing agencies tend to embrace partnerships and the concept of multi-agency approaches to prevent crime, there appears an inherent resistance to the transfer of traditional policing functions to alternative providers. This article explores the possibility whether private security personnel are able to perform traditional public policing functions including offender processing. This research considers the processing of first-offender adult shopstealers. ...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The encroachment of alternative or private policing entities within public safety and community crime prevention has expanded to the point that private personnel greatly outnumber public police. As public resources continue to be thinly dispersed and their focus prioritised across communities, modern security providers now assume responsibility for many traditional policing functions such as surveillance of public space, protection of public buildings and “mass private property” and the investigation of internal corporate crime. Although public policing agencies tend to embrace partnerships and the concept of multi-agency approaches to prevent crime, there appears an inherent resistance to the transfer of traditional policing functions to alternative providers. This article explores the possibility whether private security personnel are able to perform traditional public policing functions including offender processing. This research considers the processing of first-offender adult shopstealers. ...

Key concepts: Crime prevention, Business, Agency (philosophy), Public relations, Private security, Community policing, Private sector, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public and Private Policing in Retail — Research Paper | ScholarLens