2014The Journal of ImmunologyRequires access

The role of Foxp3 in Treg homeostatic proliferation: Necessary for nTregs, but insufficient for iTregs. (LYM3P.734)

Yan Lin, David M. Rothstein

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract NTregs exhibit higher homeostatic proliferation (HP) than Tconv which may provide a competitive advantage during Treg adoptive immunotherapy. Increased Treg HP could be 2° to a self-reactive TCR repertoire and/or Foxp3-mediated increase in survival/fitness. To address this, CFSE-labeled CD4 populations from Foxp3-reporter mice, were compared 10d after transfer into wt mice. We generated Foxp3+ iTregs by activating Tconv and adding TGFβ, or transducing with Foxp3-retrovirus (RV). iTregs did not increase HP over Tconv controls (no TGFβ; RV-vector). Thus, Foxp3 itself is not sufficient to augment HP. To determine the role of Foxp3, we examined GFP+ nTreg from Filig mice (F-nTreg; Foxp3 ~10% wt levels due to unstable mRNA). F-nTreg exhibited reduced HP (10%) vs. wt nTregs (50%). Foxp3-RV transduction increased HP of F-nTregs, while RV-control had no effect (40 vs. 12%). Thus, Foxp3 is necessary for high HP by nTreg. We also examined role of Foxp3 during thymic ontogeny, irradiated Thy1.1 hosts received Filig (Thy1.2) bone marrow that was transduced with Foxp3-RV vs. RV-control. Surprisingly, in this setting, Tconv cells (no endogenous Foxp3) constitutively expressing Foxp3, exhibited increased HP vs. Foxp3- RV-controls (32 vs. 12%). Thus, Foxp3 increases HP in nTreg and when expressed during thymic ontogeny but not in mature Tconv. Our findings provide new insight into the role of Foxp3 expression in Treg homeostasis and highlight additional distinctions between iTreg and nTreg.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract NTregs exhibit higher homeostatic proliferation (HP) than Tconv which may provide a competitive advantage during Treg adoptive immunotherapy. Increased Treg HP could be 2° to a self-reactive TCR repertoire and/or Foxp3-mediated increase in survival/fitness. To address this, CFSE-labeled CD4 populations from Foxp3-reporter mice, were compared 10d after transfer into wt mice. We generated Foxp3+ iTregs by activating Tconv and adding TGFβ, or transducing with Foxp3-retrovirus (RV). iTregs did not increase HP over Tconv controls (no TGFβ; RV-vector). Thus, Foxp3 itself is not sufficient to augment HP. To determine the role of Foxp3, we examined GFP+ nTreg from Filig mice (F-nTreg; Foxp3 ~10% wt levels due to unstable mRNA). F-nTreg exhibited reduced HP (10%) vs. wt nTregs (50%). Foxp3-RV transduction increased HP of F-nTregs, while RV-control had no effect (40 vs. 12%). Thus, Foxp3 is necessary for high HP by nTreg. We also examined role of Foxp3 during thymic ontogeny, irradiated Thy1.1 hosts received Filig (Thy1.2) bone marrow that was transduced with Foxp3-RV vs. RV-control. Surprisingly, in this setting, Tconv cells (no endogenous Foxp3) constitutively expressing Foxp3, exhibited increased HP vs. Foxp3- RV-controls (32 vs. 12%). Thus, Foxp3 increases HP in nTreg and when expressed during thymic ontogeny but not in mature Tconv. Our findings provide new insight into the role of Foxp3 expression in Treg homeostasis and highlight additional distinctions between iTreg and nTreg.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract NTregs exhibit higher homeostatic proliferation (HP) than Tconv which may provide a competitive advantage during Treg adoptive immunotherapy. Increased Treg HP could be 2° to a self-reactive TCR repertoire and/or Foxp3-mediated increase in survival/fitness. To address this, CFSE-labeled CD4 populations from Foxp3-reporter mice, were compared 10d after transfer into wt mice. We generated Foxp3+ iTregs by activating Tconv and adding TGFβ, or transducing with Foxp3-retrovirus (RV). iTregs did not increase HP over Tconv controls (no TGFβ; RV-vector). Thus, Foxp3 itself is not sufficient to augment HP. To determine the role of Foxp3, we examined GFP+ nTreg from Filig mice (F-nTreg; Foxp3 ~10% wt levels due to unstable mRNA). F-nTreg exhibited reduced HP (10%) vs. wt nTregs (50%). Foxp3-RV transduction increased HP of F-nTregs, while RV-control had no effect (40 vs. 12%). Thus, Foxp3 is necessary for high HP by nTreg. We also examined role of Foxp3 during thymic ontogeny, irradiated Thy1.1 hosts received Filig (Thy1.2) bone marrow that was transduced with Foxp3-RV vs. RV-control. Surprisingly, in this setting, Tconv cells (no endogenous Foxp3) constitutively expressing Foxp3, exhibited increased HP vs. Foxp3- RV-controls (32 vs. 12%). Thus, Foxp3 increases HP in nTreg and when expressed during thymic ontogeny but not in mature Tconv. Our findings provide new insight into the role of Foxp3 expression in Treg homeostasis and highlight additional distinctions between iTreg and nTreg.

Key concepts: FOXP3, Adoptive cell transfer, Immunology, Transforming growth factor beta, Homeostasis, Endogeny, Biology, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of Foxp3 in Treg homeostatic proliferation: Necessary for nTregs, but insufficient for iTregs. (LYM3P.734) — Research Paper | ScholarLens