2010Lincoln (University of Nebraska)Open access

STATUS OF NON-MIGRATORY WHOOPING CRANES IN FLORIDA

Martin J. Folk, James A. Rodgers, Timothy A. Dellinger, Stephen A. Nesbitt, Jeannette M. Parker, Marilyn G. Spalding, Stephen B. Baynes, M. Kathleen Chappell, Stephen T. Schwikert

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

We soft-released 289 whooping cranes (Grus americana) into central Florida during 1993-2006 in an effort to establish a non-migratory population. As of September 2008, the population numbered 30 birds (11 pairs), including 12 males and 18 females. Survival and productivity rates have been lower than expected. Males did not survive past 10 years of age, whereas females have lived to at least 15 years of age. Most older males died as a result of predation or from colliding with power lines. We marked power lines and developed a streamlined transmitter to help reduce the number of collisions with the lines. From 68 nests monitored between 1999 and 2008, 31 chicks hatched and 9 fledged. Since 2002, when the first wild chick fledged, 3 wild-fledged birds have died and 1 has gone missing and is presumed dead. Florida has undergone several major droughts since the first nest was initiated in 1999; rainfall and wetland water levels did not meet apparent thresholds necessary for productivity in 6 out of 10 study years. Loss of habitat was an additional concern.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We soft-released 289 whooping cranes (Grus americana) into central Florida during 1993-2006 in an effort to establish a non-migratory population. As of September 2008, the population numbered 30 birds (11 pairs), including 12 males and 18 females. Survival and productivity rates have been lower than expected. Males did not survive past 10 years of age, whereas females have lived to at least 15 years of age. Most older males died as a result of predation or from colliding with power lines. We marked power lines and developed a streamlined transmitter to help reduce the number of collisions with the lines. From 68 nests monitored between 1999 and 2008, 31 chicks hatched and 9 fledged. Since 2002, when the first wild chick fledged, 3 wild-fledged birds have died and 1 has gone missing and is presumed dead. Florida has undergone several major droughts since the first nest was initiated in 1999; rainfall and wetland water levels did not meet apparent thresholds necessary for productivity in 6 out of 10 study years. Loss of habitat was an additional concern.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We soft-released 289 whooping cranes (Grus americana) into central Florida during 1993-2006 in an effort to establish a non-migratory population. As of September 2008, the population numbered 30 birds (11 pairs), including 12 males and 18 females. Survival and productivity rates have been lower than expected. Males did not survive past 10 years of age, whereas females have lived to at least 15 years of age. Most older males died as a result of predation or from colliding with power lines. We marked power lines and developed a streamlined transmitter to help reduce the number of collisions with the lines. From 68 nests monitored between 1999 and 2008, 31 chicks hatched and 9 fledged. Since 2002, when the first wild chick fledged, 3 wild-fledged birds have died and 1 has gone missing and is presumed dead. Florida has undergone several major droughts since the first nest was initiated in 1999; rainfall and wetland water levels did not meet apparent thresholds necessary for productivity in 6 out of 10 study years. Loss of habitat was an additional concern.

Key concepts: Whooping cough, Geography, Medicine, Virology, Vaccination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
STATUS OF NON-MIGRATORY WHOOPING CRANES IN FLORIDA — Research Paper | ScholarLens