2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Assessing the Impact of Regional Integration: Do regional trade institutions shape trade patterns?

Simon Fink, Sebastian Krapohl

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Economic interdependence plays a major role in most theories of regional integration: As precondition, and as outcome of regional integration. For Europe, the nexus between interdependence and integration is almost taken as given. However, for other integration projects, empirical analyses are scarce. The paper analyzes the relation between regional integration institutions and economic interdependence applying diachronic network analysis to five regional integration projects: the EC/EU, NAFTA, MERCOSUR, ASEAN and SADC. The development of economic interdependence patterns is compared to elucidate the impact of regional integration on interdependence. The main result is that regional integration projects comprising countries of the North exhibit a significant amount of interregional interdependence. Regional integration projects of the South are much more oriented towards partners in the North. Interregional interdependence in the South emerges only very seldom, and is very susceptible to external shocks. Thus, to account for regional integration projects in the South, one should study their effect on interregionalism, i.e. their relationships to external partners in the Northern hemisphere.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Economic interdependence plays a major role in most theories of regional integration: As precondition, and as outcome of regional integration. For Europe, the nexus between interdependence and integration is almost taken as given. However, for other integration projects, empirical analyses are scarce. The paper analyzes the relation between regional integration institutions and economic interdependence applying diachronic network analysis to five regional integration projects: the EC/EU, NAFTA, MERCOSUR, ASEAN and SADC. The development of economic interdependence patterns is compared to elucidate the impact of regional integration on interdependence. The main result is that regional integration projects comprising countries of the North exhibit a significant amount of interregional interdependence. Regional integration projects of the South are much more oriented towards partners in the North. Interregional interdependence in the South emerges only very seldom, and is very susceptible to external shocks. Thus, to account for regional integration projects in the South, one should study their effect on interregionalism, i.e. their relationships to external partners in the Northern hemisphere.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Economic interdependence plays a major role in most theories of regional integration: As precondition, and as outcome of regional integration. For Europe, the nexus between interdependence and integration is almost taken as given. However, for other integration projects, empirical analyses are scarce. The paper analyzes the relation between regional integration institutions and economic interdependence applying diachronic network analysis to five regional integration projects: the EC/EU, NAFTA, MERCOSUR, ASEAN and SADC. The development of economic interdependence patterns is compared to elucidate the impact of regional integration on interdependence. The main result is that regional integration projects comprising countries of the North exhibit a significant amount of interregional interdependence. Regional integration projects of the South are much more oriented towards partners in the North. Interregional interdependence in the South emerges only very seldom, and is very susceptible to external shocks. Thus, to account for regional integration projects in the South, one should study their effect on interregionalism, i.e. their relationships to external partners in the Northern hemisphere.

Key concepts: Regional integration, Nexus (standard), Economic integration, Economic geography, Regional trade, Economic interdependence, International trade, Financial integration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing the Impact of Regional Integration: Do regional trade institutions shape trade patterns? — Research Paper | ScholarLens