2010•PubMedRequires access

Misoprostol for second trimester abortion in women with prior uterine incisions.

M Varras, Ch Akrivis

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Termination of pregnancy in the second trimester with misoprostol is safe and effective, but there is very limited published experience of its use in women with one or more previous cesarean sections. Uterine rupture might occur when misoprostol and oxytocin are used for pregnancy termination at the second trimester in women with previous uterine scars. In the English literature there are some case-series of studied women with a history of previous cesarean sections, in which misoprostol was used for second trimester termination of pregnancy. However, many different protocols have been used with different doses of misoprostol and different intervals between doses and it is difficult to draw definite conclusions. Therefore, the decision to attempt pregnancy termination in the second trimester in cases with previous uterine scar should be made on a case-by-case basis, after consideration of the number of previous cesarean sections and gestational age, and careful labor monitoring of these patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Termination of pregnancy in the second trimester with misoprostol is safe and effective, but there is very limited published experience of its use in women with one or more previous cesarean sections. Uterine rupture might occur when misoprostol and oxytocin are used for pregnancy termination at the second trimester in women with previous uterine scars. In the English literature there are some case-series of studied women with a history of previous cesarean sections, in which misoprostol was used for second trimester termination of pregnancy. However, many different protocols have been used with different doses of misoprostol and different intervals between doses and it is difficult to draw definite conclusions. Therefore, the decision to attempt pregnancy termination in the second trimester in cases with previous uterine scar should be made on a case-by-case basis, after consideration of the number of previous cesarean sections and gestational age, and careful labor monitoring of these patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Termination of pregnancy in the second trimester with misoprostol is safe and effective, but there is very limited published experience of its use in women with one or more previous cesarean sections. Uterine rupture might occur when misoprostol and oxytocin are used for pregnancy termination at the second trimester in women with previous uterine scars. In the English literature there are some case-series of studied women with a history of previous cesarean sections, in which misoprostol was used for second trimester termination of pregnancy. However, many different protocols have been used with different doses of misoprostol and different intervals between doses and it is difficult to draw definite conclusions. Therefore, the decision to attempt pregnancy termination in the second trimester in cases with previous uterine scar should be made on a case-by-case basis, after consideration of the number of previous cesarean sections and gestational age, and careful labor monitoring of these patients.

Key concepts: Misoprostol, Medicine, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Abortion, Gynecology, Products of conception, Uterine rupture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Misoprostol for second trimester abortion in women with prior uterine incisions. — Research Paper | ScholarLens