A comparison of optimum JP and LH2 turbofan engines designed for two subsonic transport missions
K. C. Civinskas
Abstract
Open-access reader
K. C. Civinskas
Abstract
Open-access reader
The use of liquid hydrogen fuel instead of JP fuel for two subsonic commercial transports was examined. The following determinations which are important to meeting noise reduction requirements were calculated: (1) take off gross weight, (2) energy consumption, and (3) direct operating costs. The optimum engine cycles were found to be the same for both fuels.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The use of liquid hydrogen fuel instead of JP fuel for two subsonic commercial transports was examined. The following determinations which are important to meeting noise reduction requirements were calculated: (1) take off gross weight, (2) energy consumption, and (3) direct operating costs. The optimum engine cycles were found to be the same for both fuels.
Key concepts: Turbofan, Fuel efficiency, Environmental science, Automotive engineering, Liquid hydrogen, Aircraft fuel system, Energy consumption, Aerospace engineering