2010•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

What Explains Variations in Democracy Assistance Programs? A Quantitative Analysis

Sarah Sunn Bush

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Why does the United States promote democracy in the ways that it does? The transnational delegation structure of democracy assistance creates incentives for democracy practitioners -- who comprise the field that I call the democracy establishment -- to promote democracy in certain ways over time. To obtain funding, members of the democracy establishment promote democracy in ways that are measurable and that are compatible with the regimes of recipient countries. A statistical analysis of an original dataset of democracy assistance projects supports this argument. The project contributes to the debate about how democracy can and should be promoted by describing and explaining how democracy assistance actually takes place. It also deepens our understanding of idea-driven networks, the international sources of domestic politics, and international delegation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why does the United States promote democracy in the ways that it does? The transnational delegation structure of democracy assistance creates incentives for democracy practitioners -- who comprise the field that I call the democracy establishment -- to promote democracy in certain ways over time. To obtain funding, members of the democracy establishment promote democracy in ways that are measurable and that are compatible with the regimes of recipient countries. A statistical analysis of an original dataset of democracy assistance projects supports this argument. The project contributes to the debate about how democracy can and should be promoted by describing and explaining how democracy assistance actually takes place. It also deepens our understanding of idea-driven networks, the international sources of domestic politics, and international delegation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Why does the United States promote democracy in the ways that it does? The transnational delegation structure of democracy assistance creates incentives for democracy practitioners -- who comprise the field that I call the democracy establishment -- to promote democracy in certain ways over time. To obtain funding, members of the democracy establishment promote democracy in ways that are measurable and that are compatible with the regimes of recipient countries. A statistical analysis of an original dataset of democracy assistance projects supports this argument. The project contributes to the debate about how democracy can and should be promoted by describing and explaining how democracy assistance actually takes place. It also deepens our understanding of idea-driven networks, the international sources of domestic politics, and international delegation.

Key concepts: Democracy, Delegation, Incentive, Argument (complex analysis), Political science, Direct democracy, Public administration, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Explains Variations in Democracy Assistance Programs? A Quantitative Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens