1977Proc. Am. Power Conf.; (United States)Requires access

Assessment of environmental impacts of coal preparation for sulfur removal

J.C. Iii. Brudick, Karen McDowell, S.H. Calhoun, Peter A. Krenkel

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The SO/sub 2/ control plan being considered by TVA for its power plants is outlined, and the results of the environmental assessment of one of the projects involved in the plan, the coal-washing facility at Paradise steam plant in Kentucky, are summarized. The proposed coal-washing plant at Paradise will reduce the SO/sub 2/ emissions of the available coal supply from around 7 lb SO/sub 2//10/sup 6/ Btu to below the 5.2 lb/10/sup 6/ Btu allowable emission rate. It is anticipated that the plant can be built by June 1981 at a capital cost of around $150 million (1976 dollars) and an annual cost of $32 million. However, it appears that the improved quality of the washed coal will offset current problems at the plant related to reliability, derating, and excess maintenance. These benefits are expected to offset the annual cost by as much as $16 million. Two alternative strategies for control of SO/sub 2/ emissions at Paradise were evaluated: low-sulfur coal and scrubbers. Both have operational and economic disadvantages. Based upon the analyses to date, it has been determined that a coal-washing facility at Paradise is the most cost-effective alternative for constant SO/sub 2/ emission control and that the environmentalmore » impact of this project when constructed as planned will not be significant.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The SO/sub 2/ control plan being considered by TVA for its power plants is outlined, and the results of the environmental assessment of one of the projects involved in the plan, the coal-washing facility at Paradise steam plant in Kentucky, are summarized. The proposed coal-washing plant at Paradise will reduce the SO/sub 2/ emissions of the available coal supply from around 7 lb SO/sub 2//10/sup 6/ Btu to below the 5.2 lb/10/sup 6/ Btu allowable emission rate. It is anticipated that the plant can be built by June 1981 at a capital cost of around $150 million (1976 dollars) and an annual cost of $32 million. However, it appears that the improved quality of the washed coal will offset current problems at the plant related to reliability, derating, and excess maintenance. These benefits are expected to offset the annual cost by as much as $16 million. Two alternative strategies for control of SO/sub 2/ emissions at Paradise were evaluated: low-sulfur coal and scrubbers. Both have operational and economic disadvantages. Based upon the analyses to date, it has been determined that a coal-washing facility at Paradise is the most cost-effective alternative for constant SO/sub 2/ emission control and that the environmentalmore » impact of this project when constructed as planned will not be significant.« less

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The SO/sub 2/ control plan being considered by TVA for its power plants is outlined, and the results of the environmental assessment of one of the projects involved in the plan, the coal-washing facility at Paradise steam plant in Kentucky, are summarized. The proposed coal-washing plant at Paradise will reduce the SO/sub 2/ emissions of the available coal supply from around 7 lb SO/sub 2//10/sup 6/ Btu to below the 5.2 lb/10/sup 6/ Btu allowable emission rate. It is anticipated that the plant can be built by June 1981 at a capital cost of around $150 million (1976 dollars) and an annual cost of $32 million. However, it appears that the improved quality of the washed coal will offset current problems at the plant related to reliability, derating, and excess maintenance. These benefits are expected to offset the annual cost by as much as $16 million. Two alternative strategies for control of SO/sub 2/ emissions at Paradise were evaluated: low-sulfur coal and scrubbers. Both have operational and economic disadvantages. Based upon the analyses to date, it has been determined that a coal-washing facility at Paradise is the most cost-effective alternative for constant SO/sub 2/ emission control and that the environmentalmore » impact of this project when constructed as planned will not be significant.« less

Key concepts: Coal, Waste management, Engineering, Environmental science, Environmental impact assessment, Environmental engineering, Ecology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of environmental impacts of coal preparation for sulfur removal — Research Paper | ScholarLens