1990PubMedRequires access

Quantifiable polyhydramnios: diagnosis and management.

Dru E. Carlson, Lawrence D. Platt, Arnold L. Medearis, Janet Horenstein

Open publisher page 78 citations

Abstract

Little has been written regarding the ultrasonographic quantification of polyhydramnios or its subsequent management. Therefore, we designed this study to define polyhydramnios using the amniotic fluid index of greater than 2 SDs above the mean for late second- to third-trimester pregnancies, or 24 cm or greater. One hundred twelve nondiabetic women referred to Women's Hospital, Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center with the descriptive diagnosis of polyhydramnios made by experienced ultrasonographers were included in the study. There was poor correlation between these descriptions and fetal outcome. Twenty-six were qualitatively described as having severe, 29 as moderate, and 57 as mild polyhydramnios. Forty-nine of the 112 patients met our definition of significant polyhydramnios by having an amniotic fluid index of 24 cm or more. This particular definition allowed the inclusion of all fetuses with serious structural defects and/or death. Seven patients had an amniotic fluid index less than 24 cm, but with the traditional quantitative definition of one pocket of 8 cm or more; none of these patients had poor fetal outcome. These data appear to suggest that the use of descriptive definitions of polyhydramnios or a single fluid pocket of 8 cm or greater should be discarded in favor of using an amniotic fluid index of 24 cm or more. Once the diagnosis of polyhydramnios is made, the patient should have a detailed sonographic evaluation, be offered cytogenetic studies, and have antepartum surveillance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Little has been written regarding the ultrasonographic quantification of polyhydramnios or its subsequent management. Therefore, we designed this study to define polyhydramnios using the amniotic fluid index of greater than 2 SDs above the mean for late second- to third-trimester pregnancies, or 24 cm or greater. One hundred twelve nondiabetic women referred to Women's Hospital, Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center with the descriptive diagnosis of polyhydramnios made by experienced ultrasonographers were included in the study. There was poor correlation between these descriptions and fetal outcome. Twenty-six were qualitatively described as having severe, 29 as moderate, and 57 as mild polyhydramnios. Forty-nine of the 112 patients met our definition of significant polyhydramnios by having an amniotic fluid index of 24 cm or more. This particular definition allowed the inclusion of all fetuses with serious structural defects and/or death. Seven patients had an amniotic fluid index less than 24 cm, but with the traditional quantitative definition of one pocket of 8 cm or more; none of these patients had poor fetal outcome. These data appear to suggest that the use of descriptive definitions of polyhydramnios or a single fluid pocket of 8 cm or greater should be discarded in favor of using an amniotic fluid index of 24 cm or more. Once the diagnosis of polyhydramnios is made, the patient should have a detailed sonographic evaluation, be offered cytogenetic studies, and have antepartum surveillance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Little has been written regarding the ultrasonographic quantification of polyhydramnios or its subsequent management. Therefore, we designed this study to define polyhydramnios using the amniotic fluid index of greater than 2 SDs above the mean for late second- to third-trimester pregnancies, or 24 cm or greater. One hundred twelve nondiabetic women referred to Women's Hospital, Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center with the descriptive diagnosis of polyhydramnios made by experienced ultrasonographers were included in the study. There was poor correlation between these descriptions and fetal outcome. Twenty-six were qualitatively described as having severe, 29 as moderate, and 57 as mild polyhydramnios. Forty-nine of the 112 patients met our definition of significant polyhydramnios by having an amniotic fluid index of 24 cm or more. This particular definition allowed the inclusion of all fetuses with serious structural defects and/or death. Seven patients had an amniotic fluid index less than 24 cm, but with the traditional quantitative definition of one pocket of 8 cm or more; none of these patients had poor fetal outcome. These data appear to suggest that the use of descriptive definitions of polyhydramnios or a single fluid pocket of 8 cm or greater should be discarded in favor of using an amniotic fluid index of 24 cm or more. Once the diagnosis of polyhydramnios is made, the patient should have a detailed sonographic evaluation, be offered cytogenetic studies, and have antepartum surveillance.

Key concepts: Polyhydramnios, Medicine, Amniotic fluid index, Amniotic fluid, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Fetus, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantifiable polyhydramnios: diagnosis and management. — Research Paper | ScholarLens