2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Biodiversitätsbewertung von Bio-Ackerbaubetriebenin Österreich

Thomas Drapela, R Petrásek, Matthias Meier, Lukas Pfiffner, Thomas Lindenthal, Christian Schader

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presents results of an on-farm biodiversity assessment of 45 organic arable farms in eastern Austria (region Weinviertel). The core of the assessment method consists of 99 parameters concerning agricultural practices and semi-natural habitats and their impacts on genetic diversity, habitat diversity and species diversity of eleven indicator species groups. For each farm, a biodiversity performance score was calculated ranging from 0 to 100 %, where 100 % would be reached with the highest possible scores for all parameters. The biodiversity assessment of the 45 organic arable farms revealed big between-farm differences in the biodiversity performance (16.8 to 50.6 %; O 32.8 ± 6.1 %). While 32 farms for example achieved biodiversity scores > 40 % in their crop area, only nine farms got more than 10 % concerning semi-natural habitats. These results show that although the assessed farms achieved good biodiversity performances regarding their agricultural practices due to their organic management, semi-natural habitats – which play an essential role in conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes – are underrepresented on all farms and reveal the need for improvement concerning conserving and promoting biodiversity on these farms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents results of an on-farm biodiversity assessment of 45 organic arable farms in eastern Austria (region Weinviertel). The core of the assessment method consists of 99 parameters concerning agricultural practices and semi-natural habitats and their impacts on genetic diversity, habitat diversity and species diversity of eleven indicator species groups. For each farm, a biodiversity performance score was calculated ranging from 0 to 100 %, where 100 % would be reached with the highest possible scores for all parameters. The biodiversity assessment of the 45 organic arable farms revealed big between-farm differences in the biodiversity performance (16.8 to 50.6 %; O 32.8 ± 6.1 %). While 32 farms for example achieved biodiversity scores > 40 % in their crop area, only nine farms got more than 10 % concerning semi-natural habitats. These results show that although the assessed farms achieved good biodiversity performances regarding their agricultural practices due to their organic management, semi-natural habitats – which play an essential role in conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes – are underrepresented on all farms and reveal the need for improvement concerning conserving and promoting biodiversity on these farms.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents results of an on-farm biodiversity assessment of 45 organic arable farms in eastern Austria (region Weinviertel). The core of the assessment method consists of 99 parameters concerning agricultural practices and semi-natural habitats and their impacts on genetic diversity, habitat diversity and species diversity of eleven indicator species groups. For each farm, a biodiversity performance score was calculated ranging from 0 to 100 %, where 100 % would be reached with the highest possible scores for all parameters. The biodiversity assessment of the 45 organic arable farms revealed big between-farm differences in the biodiversity performance (16.8 to 50.6 %; O 32.8 ± 6.1 %). While 32 farms for example achieved biodiversity scores > 40 % in their crop area, only nine farms got more than 10 % concerning semi-natural habitats. These results show that although the assessed farms achieved good biodiversity performances regarding their agricultural practices due to their organic management, semi-natural habitats – which play an essential role in conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes – are underrepresented on all farms and reveal the need for improvement concerning conserving and promoting biodiversity on these farms.

Key concepts: Biodiversity, Arable land, Agricultural biodiversity, Habitat, Agriculture, Geography, Agroforestry, Organic farming

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Biodiversitätsbewertung von Bio-Ackerbaubetriebenin Österreich — Research Paper | ScholarLens