Biodiversitätsbewertung von Bio-Ackerbaubetriebenin Österreich
Thomas Drapela, R Petrásek, Matthias Meier, Lukas Pfiffner, Thomas Lindenthal, Christian Schader
Abstract
Thomas Drapela, R Petrásek, Matthias Meier, Lukas Pfiffner, Thomas Lindenthal, Christian Schader
Abstract
This paper presents results of an on-farm biodiversity assessment of 45 organic arable farms in eastern Austria (region Weinviertel). The core of the assessment method consists of 99 parameters concerning agricultural practices and semi-natural habitats and their impacts on genetic diversity, habitat diversity and species diversity of eleven indicator species groups. For each farm, a biodiversity performance score was calculated ranging from 0 to 100 %, where 100 % would be reached with the highest possible scores for all parameters. The biodiversity assessment of the 45 organic arable farms revealed big between-farm differences in the biodiversity performance (16.8 to 50.6 %; O 32.8 ± 6.1 %). While 32 farms for example achieved biodiversity scores > 40 % in their crop area, only nine farms got more than 10 % concerning semi-natural habitats. These results show that although the assessed farms achieved good biodiversity performances regarding their agricultural practices due to their organic management, semi-natural habitats – which play an essential role in conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes – are underrepresented on all farms and reveal the need for improvement concerning conserving and promoting biodiversity on these farms.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper presents results of an on-farm biodiversity assessment of 45 organic arable farms in eastern Austria (region Weinviertel). The core of the assessment method consists of 99 parameters concerning agricultural practices and semi-natural habitats and their impacts on genetic diversity, habitat diversity and species diversity of eleven indicator species groups. For each farm, a biodiversity performance score was calculated ranging from 0 to 100 %, where 100 % would be reached with the highest possible scores for all parameters. The biodiversity assessment of the 45 organic arable farms revealed big between-farm differences in the biodiversity performance (16.8 to 50.6 %; O 32.8 ± 6.1 %). While 32 farms for example achieved biodiversity scores > 40 % in their crop area, only nine farms got more than 10 % concerning semi-natural habitats. These results show that although the assessed farms achieved good biodiversity performances regarding their agricultural practices due to their organic management, semi-natural habitats – which play an essential role in conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes – are underrepresented on all farms and reveal the need for improvement concerning conserving and promoting biodiversity on these farms.
Key concepts: Biodiversity, Arable land, Agricultural biodiversity, Habitat, Agriculture, Geography, Agroforestry, Organic farming