2012Madras Agricultural JournalOpen access

Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation

T. Senthilkumar, V. Duraisamy, D. Asokan

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance of three power weeder models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders was 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registred maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 per cent (wet basis) and 82.5 per cent (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 per cent (wet basis) and 73.45 per cent(dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 per cent (wet basis) and 64.15 per cent (dry basis) and Model C recorded the lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 per cent (wet basis) and 43.13 per cent (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding was observed as 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 per cent respectively for Models A, B and C when compared to manual weeding. The saving in time of weeding operation was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 per cent for Models A, B and C, respectively when compared to the manual weeding.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance of three power weeder models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders was 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registred maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 per cent (wet basis) and 82.5 per cent (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 per cent (wet basis) and 73.45 per cent(dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 per cent (wet basis) and 64.15 per cent (dry basis) and Model C recorded the lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 per cent (wet basis) and 43.13 per cent (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding was observed as 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 per cent respectively for Models A, B and C when compared to manual weeding. The saving in time of weeding operation was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 per cent for Models A, B and C, respectively when compared to the manual weeding.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance of three power weeder models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders was 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registred maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 per cent (wet basis) and 82.5 per cent (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 per cent (wet basis) and 73.45 per cent(dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 per cent (wet basis) and 64.15 per cent (dry basis) and Model C recorded the lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 per cent (wet basis) and 43.13 per cent (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding was observed as 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 per cent respectively for Models A, B and C when compared to manual weeding. The saving in time of weeding operation was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 per cent for Models A, B and C, respectively when compared to the manual weeding.

Key concepts: Mathematics, Crop, Agronomy, Animal science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation — Research Paper | ScholarLens