2003PubMedRequires access

Monitoring of intrathoracic volemia and cardiac output in critically ill children.

Corrado Cecchetti, Francesca Stoppa, N. Vanacore, M A Barbieri, Umberto Raucci, Elisabetta Pasotti, C Tomasello, Marco Marano, Nicola Pirozzi

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

AIM: Hemodynamic monitoring is an important step in the management of critically ill children despite the difficulty in measuring preload indices continuously. The aim of the study was to analyze cardiac output parameters and preload indices after acute changes in mean airway pressure and volemia. METHODS: Twenty-three children treated at our unit were enrolled in a prospective non randomized cohort study. Respiration was supported by controlled mechanical ventilation with positive expiratory-end pressure (PEEP), peak inspiratory pressure <20 cm H(2)O and mean airway pressure <10 cm H(2)O, and hemodynamic monitoring using the PiCCO system. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at T0 (base line), T(1) (after an increase in PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O for 10 min), and T(2) (after fluid challenge). The statistical analysis (BMPD New System software package) comprised comparison of changes at T(0) vs T(1), T(1) vs T(2) and T(0) vs T(2), construction of 3 correlation matrices and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-nine hemodynamic parameters were measured in the 23 patients. A comparison between T(0) and T(1) showed no significant changes; differences between T(0) and T(2) were found for cardiac index (CI), (p=0.003); between T(0) and T(2) significant differences were found for CI (p=0.0015), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) (p=0.04) and stroke volume index (SVI) (p=0.06). The analysis of the correlation matrices yielded ITBVI with CI (p=0.0006), ITBVI with SVI (p=1 x 10(-5)), CI with SVI (p=0.002); a significant correlation between CI and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) was found only at T(1). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that ITBVI and SVI were predictive for variance of CI at each time point. CONCLUSION: ITBVI measured by a volumetric monitoring system such as the PiCCO may be considered a sensitive preload indicator also in critically ill children.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: Hemodynamic monitoring is an important step in the management of critically ill children despite the difficulty in measuring preload indices continuously. The aim of the study was to analyze cardiac output parameters and preload indices after acute changes in mean airway pressure and volemia. METHODS: Twenty-three children treated at our unit were enrolled in a prospective non randomized cohort study. Respiration was supported by controlled mechanical ventilation with positive expiratory-end pressure (PEEP), peak inspiratory pressure <20 cm H(2)O and mean airway pressure <10 cm H(2)O, and hemodynamic monitoring using the PiCCO system. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at T0 (base line), T(1) (after an increase in PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O for 10 min), and T(2) (after fluid challenge). The statistical analysis (BMPD New System software package) comprised comparison of changes at T(0) vs T(1), T(1) vs T(2) and T(0) vs T(2), construction of 3 correlation matrices and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-nine hemodynamic parameters were measured in the 23 patients. A comparison between T(0) and T(1) showed no significant changes; differences between T(0) and T(2) were found for cardiac index (CI), (p=0.003); between T(0) and T(2) significant differences were found for CI (p=0.0015), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) (p=0.04) and stroke volume index (SVI) (p=0.06). The analysis of the correlation matrices yielded ITBVI with CI (p=0.0006), ITBVI with SVI (p=1 x 10(-5)), CI with SVI (p=0.002); a significant correlation between CI and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) was found only at T(1). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that ITBVI and SVI were predictive for variance of CI at each time point. CONCLUSION: ITBVI measured by a volumetric monitoring system such as the PiCCO may be considered a sensitive preload indicator also in critically ill children.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: Hemodynamic monitoring is an important step in the management of critically ill children despite the difficulty in measuring preload indices continuously. The aim of the study was to analyze cardiac output parameters and preload indices after acute changes in mean airway pressure and volemia. METHODS: Twenty-three children treated at our unit were enrolled in a prospective non randomized cohort study. Respiration was supported by controlled mechanical ventilation with positive expiratory-end pressure (PEEP), peak inspiratory pressure <20 cm H(2)O and mean airway pressure <10 cm H(2)O, and hemodynamic monitoring using the PiCCO system. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at T0 (base line), T(1) (after an increase in PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O for 10 min), and T(2) (after fluid challenge). The statistical analysis (BMPD New System software package) comprised comparison of changes at T(0) vs T(1), T(1) vs T(2) and T(0) vs T(2), construction of 3 correlation matrices and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-nine hemodynamic parameters were measured in the 23 patients. A comparison between T(0) and T(1) showed no significant changes; differences between T(0) and T(2) were found for cardiac index (CI), (p=0.003); between T(0) and T(2) significant differences were found for CI (p=0.0015), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) (p=0.04) and stroke volume index (SVI) (p=0.06). The analysis of the correlation matrices yielded ITBVI with CI (p=0.0006), ITBVI with SVI (p=1 x 10(-5)), CI with SVI (p=0.002); a significant correlation between CI and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) was found only at T(1). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that ITBVI and SVI were predictive for variance of CI at each time point. CONCLUSION: ITBVI measured by a volumetric monitoring system such as the PiCCO may be considered a sensitive preload indicator also in critically ill children.

Key concepts: Medicine, Preload, Cardiac index, Cardiac output, Hemodynamics, Stroke volume, Central venous pressure, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monitoring of intrathoracic volemia and cardiac output in critically ill children. — Research Paper | ScholarLens