2011Humana Press eBooksRequires access

Breath Tests for Assessment of Gastric Emptying

Henry P. Parkman, Lawrence A. Szarka

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Patients are often evaluated for gastric motility disorders, such as gastroparesis by measuring gastric emptying. For nearly 30 years, scintigraphy has been considered the main test for measuring gastric emptying and documenting delayed gastric emptying. There are a variety of ways to measure gastric emptying with scintigraphy with marked variations in the type of meal and duration of imaging. Clinically, it is best to measure the emptying of solids because liquid emptying can often be normal when solid emptying is markedly delayed. Recently, it has become apparent that prolonging the GES for 4 h may improve the diagnostic utility of the test. However, institutions perform the test in different ways with regards to meal content, imaging intervals, and length of test. These differences in performance of gastric emptying scintigraphy at different institutions have made this test less helpful in clinical settings. Scintigraphy is also limited by several drawbacks, including radiation exposure, expensive equipment, and the limited availability of facilities. Thus, there has been great interest in developing alternatives for effective measurement of gastric emptying in a standardized fashion. One such alternative is nonradioactive isotope breath testing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Patients are often evaluated for gastric motility disorders, such as gastroparesis by measuring gastric emptying. For nearly 30 years, scintigraphy has been considered the main test for measuring gastric emptying and documenting delayed gastric emptying. There are a variety of ways to measure gastric emptying with scintigraphy with marked variations in the type of meal and duration of imaging. Clinically, it is best to measure the emptying of solids because liquid emptying can often be normal when solid emptying is markedly delayed. Recently, it has become apparent that prolonging the GES for 4 h may improve the diagnostic utility of the test. However, institutions perform the test in different ways with regards to meal content, imaging intervals, and length of test. These differences in performance of gastric emptying scintigraphy at different institutions have made this test less helpful in clinical settings. Scintigraphy is also limited by several drawbacks, including radiation exposure, expensive equipment, and the limited availability of facilities. Thus, there has been great interest in developing alternatives for effective measurement of gastric emptying in a standardized fashion. One such alternative is nonradioactive isotope breath testing.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Patients are often evaluated for gastric motility disorders, such as gastroparesis by measuring gastric emptying. For nearly 30 years, scintigraphy has been considered the main test for measuring gastric emptying and documenting delayed gastric emptying. There are a variety of ways to measure gastric emptying with scintigraphy with marked variations in the type of meal and duration of imaging. Clinically, it is best to measure the emptying of solids because liquid emptying can often be normal when solid emptying is markedly delayed. Recently, it has become apparent that prolonging the GES for 4 h may improve the diagnostic utility of the test. However, institutions perform the test in different ways with regards to meal content, imaging intervals, and length of test. These differences in performance of gastric emptying scintigraphy at different institutions have made this test less helpful in clinical settings. Scintigraphy is also limited by several drawbacks, including radiation exposure, expensive equipment, and the limited availability of facilities. Thus, there has been great interest in developing alternatives for effective measurement of gastric emptying in a standardized fashion. One such alternative is nonradioactive isotope breath testing.

Key concepts: Gastric emptying, Gastroparesis, Scintigraphy, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Breath test, Internal medicine, Nuclear medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Breath Tests for Assessment of Gastric Emptying — Research Paper | ScholarLens