1961K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University)Requires access

Grain sorghum silage vs. forage sorghum silage; dehydrated alfalfa vs. Vitamin A, and the value of Aureomycin in cattle rations

D. Richardson, E.F. Smith, B A Koch, Fred W. Boren

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Two types of sorghum silage were used in this test. They were (1) DeKalb forage type which produced approximately 100 bushels of grain and 20 tons of silage per acre; and (2) RS610 grain type which produced approximately 75 bushels of grain and 10 tons of silage per acre. Forty Hereford heifer calves were divided into four lots of 10 each. Three lots received the grain sorghum silage and one the forage silage plus 2 pounds of grain. This was an attempt to keep the grain intake equal in all lots; however, since the forage sorghum produced so much grain, this lot may have received slightly more grain than others. Dehydrated alfalfa as a source of vitamin A was compared with vitamin A and with vitamin A plus Aureomycin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two types of sorghum silage were used in this test. They were (1) DeKalb forage type which produced approximately 100 bushels of grain and 20 tons of silage per acre; and (2) RS610 grain type which produced approximately 75 bushels of grain and 10 tons of silage per acre. Forty Hereford heifer calves were divided into four lots of 10 each. Three lots received the grain sorghum silage and one the forage silage plus 2 pounds of grain. This was an attempt to keep the grain intake equal in all lots; however, since the forage sorghum produced so much grain, this lot may have received slightly more grain than others. Dehydrated alfalfa as a source of vitamin A was compared with vitamin A and with vitamin A plus Aureomycin.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two types of sorghum silage were used in this test. They were (1) DeKalb forage type which produced approximately 100 bushels of grain and 20 tons of silage per acre; and (2) RS610 grain type which produced approximately 75 bushels of grain and 10 tons of silage per acre. Forty Hereford heifer calves were divided into four lots of 10 each. Three lots received the grain sorghum silage and one the forage silage plus 2 pounds of grain. This was an attempt to keep the grain intake equal in all lots; however, since the forage sorghum produced so much grain, this lot may have received slightly more grain than others. Dehydrated alfalfa as a source of vitamin A was compared with vitamin A and with vitamin A plus Aureomycin.

Key concepts: Silage, Sorghum, Forage, Agronomy, Food science, Biology, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Grain sorghum silage vs. forage sorghum silage; dehydrated alfalfa vs. Vitamin A, and the value of Aureomycin in cattle rations — Research Paper | ScholarLens