1986•PubMedRequires access

[Immunohistochemical study of subependymal giant cell tumor associated with tuberous sclerosis].

Misako Takayasu, Minoru Shibuya, M Kanamori, Kanefusa Katoh, Junji Yoshida, N Kageyama

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Subependymal giant cell tumors from four patients associated with tuberous sclerosis were examined by peroxidase antiperoxidase (PAP) immunohistochemistry for neuron specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S-100 protein. The tumor cells were grouped into three morphological types: ganglion-like pyramidal cells, swollen gemistocytic cells and fibrillated spindle cells. There was little difference in immunohistochemical property between these cell types in each case, suggesting that the tumor cells of different cell types have a same origin. The majority of the tumor cells was intensely stained for NSE in every case. On the other hand, for GFAP none of the tumor cells was stained in two cases, and the minority was weakly stained in the other two cases. The intensity of staining of the tumor cells for S-100 protein varied from case to case. Our findings together with those of others show the definite immunohistochemical characteristics of subependymal giant cell tumors with tuberous sclerosis, i.e., strong positivity for NSE in contrast to their negativity or weak positivity for GFAP. However, these findings do not necessarily suggest that the tumor is of neuronal origin, because in the case of neoplasms the significance of the presence of NSE as indicative of neuronal origin is open to question.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Subependymal giant cell tumors from four patients associated with tuberous sclerosis were examined by peroxidase antiperoxidase (PAP) immunohistochemistry for neuron specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S-100 protein. The tumor cells were grouped into three morphological types: ganglion-like pyramidal cells, swollen gemistocytic cells and fibrillated spindle cells. There was little difference in immunohistochemical property between these cell types in each case, suggesting that the tumor cells of different cell types have a same origin. The majority of the tumor cells was intensely stained for NSE in every case. On the other hand, for GFAP none of the tumor cells was stained in two cases, and the minority was weakly stained in the other two cases. The intensity of staining of the tumor cells for S-100 protein varied from case to case. Our findings together with those of others show the definite immunohistochemical characteristics of subependymal giant cell tumors with tuberous sclerosis, i.e., strong positivity for NSE in contrast to their negativity or weak positivity for GFAP. However, these findings do not necessarily suggest that the tumor is of neuronal origin, because in the case of neoplasms the significance of the presence of NSE as indicative of neuronal origin is open to question.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Subependymal giant cell tumors from four patients associated with tuberous sclerosis were examined by peroxidase antiperoxidase (PAP) immunohistochemistry for neuron specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S-100 protein. The tumor cells were grouped into three morphological types: ganglion-like pyramidal cells, swollen gemistocytic cells and fibrillated spindle cells. There was little difference in immunohistochemical property between these cell types in each case, suggesting that the tumor cells of different cell types have a same origin. The majority of the tumor cells was intensely stained for NSE in every case. On the other hand, for GFAP none of the tumor cells was stained in two cases, and the minority was weakly stained in the other two cases. The intensity of staining of the tumor cells for S-100 protein varied from case to case. Our findings together with those of others show the definite immunohistochemical characteristics of subependymal giant cell tumors with tuberous sclerosis, i.e., strong positivity for NSE in contrast to their negativity or weak positivity for GFAP. However, these findings do not necessarily suggest that the tumor is of neuronal origin, because in the case of neoplasms the significance of the presence of NSE as indicative of neuronal origin is open to question.

Key concepts: Tuberous sclerosis, Subependymal zone, Pathology, Immunohistochemistry, Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, Enolase, Giant cell, Glial fibrillary acidic protein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Immunohistochemical study of subependymal giant cell tumor associated with tuberous sclerosis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens