1994OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Planning for tougher air rules

G.N. Matelli, Michael L. Bradford, R.W. Capps

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Many companies are struggling with the need to design new facilities without knowing what air emissions control requirements will be applied retroactively. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 require the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to define Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) for 189 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). These technologies will be defined in groups over the next eights years. Once each technology is defined, existing plants will have three years to retrofit their facilities to meet the MACTs. Today, plants are being designed to meet current New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), which are potentially less stringent than MACT. MACT may require emission control facilities at plants to be retrofitted with more effective systems. While EPA has not determined MACT for all processes and for all HAPs, good engineering judgment can be used to anticipate which MACT may be required. This will vary by component and process. The severity of MACT requirements for different processes can be expected to fall between NSPS as a minimum and the current National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations as a maximum. One approach to predicting the expected MACT is to look at the major sources of air emissions in amore » plant.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many companies are struggling with the need to design new facilities without knowing what air emissions control requirements will be applied retroactively. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 require the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to define Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) for 189 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). These technologies will be defined in groups over the next eights years. Once each technology is defined, existing plants will have three years to retrofit their facilities to meet the MACTs. Today, plants are being designed to meet current New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), which are potentially less stringent than MACT. MACT may require emission control facilities at plants to be retrofitted with more effective systems. While EPA has not determined MACT for all processes and for all HAPs, good engineering judgment can be used to anticipate which MACT may be required. This will vary by component and process. The severity of MACT requirements for different processes can be expected to fall between NSPS as a minimum and the current National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations as a maximum. One approach to predicting the expected MACT is to look at the major sources of air emissions in amore » plant.« less

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many companies are struggling with the need to design new facilities without knowing what air emissions control requirements will be applied retroactively. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 require the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to define Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) for 189 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). These technologies will be defined in groups over the next eights years. Once each technology is defined, existing plants will have three years to retrofit their facilities to meet the MACTs. Today, plants are being designed to meet current New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), which are potentially less stringent than MACT. MACT may require emission control facilities at plants to be retrofitted with more effective systems. While EPA has not determined MACT for all processes and for all HAPs, good engineering judgment can be used to anticipate which MACT may be required. This will vary by component and process. The severity of MACT requirements for different processes can be expected to fall between NSPS as a minimum and the current National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations as a maximum. One approach to predicting the expected MACT is to look at the major sources of air emissions in amore » plant.« less

Key concepts: Clean Air Act, Hazardous air pollutants, Hazardous waste, Criteria air contaminants, Control (management), Engineering, Process (computing), Air pollutants

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Planning for tougher air rules — Research Paper | ScholarLens