2008Isokinetics and Exercise ScienceRequires access

Test-retest reproducibility of isokinetic lifting strength measurements

Serdil Yüzer, Ece Aydoğ, Eda Gürçay, Ece Ünlü Akyüz, Aytül Çakçı

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the intra-rater reproducibility of normalized lifting strength (NLS) measurements. Methods: 30 healthy male volunteers with a mean age of 28.16 ± 7.59 years participated in this study. Each subject was tested by the same physician twice in a week, with at least 48 hours between the test sessions. For the evaluation of intra-rater reproducibility, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest real difference (SRD) and Bland and Altman method were used. Results: Intra-rater ICCs of the NLS were 0.77 and 0.67 at 19.4 and 38.9 cm/s, respectively. The SEM% were 13.2% and 20.1% while the SRD% were 36.6% and 55.8% at these velocities, respectively. Conclusions: The reproducibility of NLS using the Biodex Lift Simulation Attachment was moderate in terms of the ICC and low in terms of the SRD. Thus the test, as described and applied is not sufficiently sensitive to detect clinically relevant changes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To determine the intra-rater reproducibility of normalized lifting strength (NLS) measurements. Methods: 30 healthy male volunteers with a mean age of 28.16 ± 7.59 years participated in this study. Each subject was tested by the same physician twice in a week, with at least 48 hours between the test sessions. For the evaluation of intra-rater reproducibility, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest real difference (SRD) and Bland and Altman method were used. Results: Intra-rater ICCs of the NLS were 0.77 and 0.67 at 19.4 and 38.9 cm/s, respectively. The SEM% were 13.2% and 20.1% while the SRD% were 36.6% and 55.8% at these velocities, respectively. Conclusions: The reproducibility of NLS using the Biodex Lift Simulation Attachment was moderate in terms of the ICC and low in terms of the SRD. Thus the test, as described and applied is not sufficiently sensitive to detect clinically relevant changes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To determine the intra-rater reproducibility of normalized lifting strength (NLS) measurements. Methods: 30 healthy male volunteers with a mean age of 28.16 ± 7.59 years participated in this study. Each subject was tested by the same physician twice in a week, with at least 48 hours between the test sessions. For the evaluation of intra-rater reproducibility, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest real difference (SRD) and Bland and Altman method were used. Results: Intra-rater ICCs of the NLS were 0.77 and 0.67 at 19.4 and 38.9 cm/s, respectively. The SEM% were 13.2% and 20.1% while the SRD% were 36.6% and 55.8% at these velocities, respectively. Conclusions: The reproducibility of NLS using the Biodex Lift Simulation Attachment was moderate in terms of the ICC and low in terms of the SRD. Thus the test, as described and applied is not sufficiently sensitive to detect clinically relevant changes.

Key concepts: Reproducibility, Test (biology), Orthodontics, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Mathematics, Medicine, Geology, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Test-retest reproducibility of isokinetic lifting strength measurements — Research Paper | ScholarLens