2009•PubMedRequires access

[In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation at Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik].

Bylgja Kaernested, Ólafur S. Indridason, Jón Baldursson, Davíð O. Arnar

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest has not been previously reported in Iceland and the purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation over a two year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There are resuscitation teams on each of the two campuses of the University Hospital in Reykjavik. Since the beginning of 2006, the resuscitation teams have compiled their reports in a structured form, Utstein style. RESULTS: During 2006 and 2007 resuscitation teams were activated on a total of 311 occasions. Of those, there was need for a full cardiopulmonary resuscitation because of cardiac arrest of in patients in 80 cases (26%). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved or the patient survived to be transferred to the intensive care unit in 55 (69%) of the 80 cases. Survival to discharge was 33%. Survival to discharge was better if the arrest occurred between 8 AM and 4 PM during daytime (50%), than outside of regular working hours (23%, p=0.02). The survival was better if ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was the first rhythm encountered (50%) than if the initial rhythm turned out to be asystole or pulseless electrical activity (12%, p=0.002). Those who survived resuscitation were generally younger than those who did not (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The outcomes were similar to those reported at institutions in our neighboring countries. The survival rate was lower if the cardiac arrest occurred outside of regular working hours and if ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was the first encountered rhythm.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest has not been previously reported in Iceland and the purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation over a two year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There are resuscitation teams on each of the two campuses of the University Hospital in Reykjavik. Since the beginning of 2006, the resuscitation teams have compiled their reports in a structured form, Utstein style. RESULTS: During 2006 and 2007 resuscitation teams were activated on a total of 311 occasions. Of those, there was need for a full cardiopulmonary resuscitation because of cardiac arrest of in patients in 80 cases (26%). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved or the patient survived to be transferred to the intensive care unit in 55 (69%) of the 80 cases. Survival to discharge was 33%. Survival to discharge was better if the arrest occurred between 8 AM and 4 PM during daytime (50%), than outside of regular working hours (23%, p=0.02). The survival was better if ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was the first rhythm encountered (50%) than if the initial rhythm turned out to be asystole or pulseless electrical activity (12%, p=0.002). Those who survived resuscitation were generally younger than those who did not (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The outcomes were similar to those reported at institutions in our neighboring countries. The survival rate was lower if the cardiac arrest occurred outside of regular working hours and if ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was the first encountered rhythm.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest has not been previously reported in Iceland and the purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation over a two year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There are resuscitation teams on each of the two campuses of the University Hospital in Reykjavik. Since the beginning of 2006, the resuscitation teams have compiled their reports in a structured form, Utstein style. RESULTS: During 2006 and 2007 resuscitation teams were activated on a total of 311 occasions. Of those, there was need for a full cardiopulmonary resuscitation because of cardiac arrest of in patients in 80 cases (26%). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved or the patient survived to be transferred to the intensive care unit in 55 (69%) of the 80 cases. Survival to discharge was 33%. Survival to discharge was better if the arrest occurred between 8 AM and 4 PM during daytime (50%), than outside of regular working hours (23%, p=0.02). The survival was better if ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was the first rhythm encountered (50%) than if the initial rhythm turned out to be asystole or pulseless electrical activity (12%, p=0.002). Those who survived resuscitation were generally younger than those who did not (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The outcomes were similar to those reported at institutions in our neighboring countries. The survival rate was lower if the cardiac arrest occurred outside of regular working hours and if ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was the first encountered rhythm.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ventricular fibrillation, Asystole, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Resuscitation, Return of spontaneous circulation, Pulseless electrical activity, Ventricular tachycardia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation at Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens