COMPARISON OF TWO TURNOUT DESIGNS IN REVENUE SERVICE
D D Davis, Joseph LoPresti
Abstract
D D Davis, Joseph LoPresti
Abstract
The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is comparing the performance of an American Railway Engineering Association (AREA) geometry turnout to that of a tangential-geometry turnout in its Advanced Turnout Evaluation Program. The turnouts have been evaluated analytically using AAR's vehicle dynamic simulation model NUCARS, and results show that reduced-entry-angle switches will provide significantly-improved performance under freight traffic. The preliminary technical analysis is discussed in the paper.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is comparing the performance of an American Railway Engineering Association (AREA) geometry turnout to that of a tangential-geometry turnout in its Advanced Turnout Evaluation Program. The turnouts have been evaluated analytically using AAR's vehicle dynamic simulation model NUCARS, and results show that reduced-entry-angle switches will provide significantly-improved performance under freight traffic. The preliminary technical analysis is discussed in the paper.
Key concepts: Turnout, Engineering, Revenue, Transport engineering, Service (business), Business, Political science, Voting