ScholarLens Back to search
1978•University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository (University of Miami)Open access

Conflict Certiorari: Is The Supreme Court of Florida Following Its Constitutional Mandate?

Ellen Catsman Freidin

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This article considers potential changes in the Supreme Court of Florida's conflict certiorari jurisdiction. After examining the inconsistent manner in which the court has interpreted its own jurisdiction, the author discusses ameliorative alternatives.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article considers potential changes in the Supreme Court of Florida's conflict certiorari jurisdiction. After examining the inconsistent manner in which the court has interpreted its own jurisdiction, the author discusses ameliorative alternatives.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article considers potential changes in the Supreme Court of Florida's conflict certiorari jurisdiction. After examining the inconsistent manner in which the court has interpreted its own jurisdiction, the author discusses ameliorative alternatives.

Key concepts: Certiorari, Supreme court, Law, Political science, Mandate, Original jurisdiction

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conflict Certiorari: Is The Supreme Court of Florida Following Its Constitutional Mandate? — Research Paper | ScholarLens