1997bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

The Limitation on Benefit Clause of the U.S.-German Tax Treaty and its Compatibility with European Union Law

Dietmar Anders

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This comment details why the limitation on benefits clause of the U.S.- German Treaty is contrary to European Union law.5 Part I describes the discriminatory situation which German companies may face and illustrates how tax treaty abuse could occur and how to prevent it. Part I also contains an introduction to the U.S.-German Treaty and provides an example of the conflict between U.S. tax treaties and European Union law. Part II analyzes in detail the Treaty's discriminatory features with respect to European Union aw and discusses potential justifications for this discrimination based on the case law of the European Court of Justice.6 Part II concludes that the limitation on benefits clause constitutes unjustified discrimination and vio- lates the EC Treaty. Part III reflects on possible solutions to the conflict, and it recommends a renegotiation of the U.S.-German Treaty. At present, an implementation of the derivative benefits concepts into this Treaty is ad- visable. However, Part I recommends that all bilateral treaties between the United States and EU Member States should later be replaced by a sin- gle tax treaty between the United States and the European Union. Part IV summarizes the conclusions drawn in Parts I-lII.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This comment details why the limitation on benefits clause of the U.S.- German Treaty is contrary to European Union law.5 Part I describes the discriminatory situation which German companies may face and illustrates how tax treaty abuse could occur and how to prevent it. Part I also contains an introduction to the U.S.-German Treaty and provides an example of the conflict between U.S. tax treaties and European Union law. Part II analyzes in detail the Treaty's discriminatory features with respect to European Union aw and discusses potential justifications for this discrimination based on the case law of the European Court of Justice.6 Part II concludes that the limitation on benefits clause constitutes unjustified discrimination and vio- lates the EC Treaty. Part III reflects on possible solutions to the conflict, and it recommends a renegotiation of the U.S.-German Treaty. At present, an implementation of the derivative benefits concepts into this Treaty is ad- visable. However, Part I recommends that all bilateral treaties between the United States and EU Member States should later be replaced by a sin- gle tax treaty between the United States and the European Union. Part IV summarizes the conclusions drawn in Parts I-lII.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This comment details why the limitation on benefits clause of the U.S.- German Treaty is contrary to European Union law.5 Part I describes the discriminatory situation which German companies may face and illustrates how tax treaty abuse could occur and how to prevent it. Part I also contains an introduction to the U.S.-German Treaty and provides an example of the conflict between U.S. tax treaties and European Union law. Part II analyzes in detail the Treaty's discriminatory features with respect to European Union aw and discusses potential justifications for this discrimination based on the case law of the European Court of Justice.6 Part II concludes that the limitation on benefits clause constitutes unjustified discrimination and vio- lates the EC Treaty. Part III reflects on possible solutions to the conflict, and it recommends a renegotiation of the U.S.-German Treaty. At present, an implementation of the derivative benefits concepts into this Treaty is ad- visable. However, Part I recommends that all bilateral treaties between the United States and EU Member States should later be replaced by a sin- gle tax treaty between the United States and the European Union. Part IV summarizes the conclusions drawn in Parts I-lII.

Key concepts: German, Treaty, European union, Compatibility (geochemistry), Political science, European Union law, Tax law, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Limitation on Benefit Clause of the U.S.-German Tax Treaty and its Compatibility with European Union Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens