Literary Genre and History: Questions from a Literary Pragmaticist for Socio-Semioticians.
Roger D. Sell
Abstract
Roger D. Sell
Abstract
This article presents the difficulties literary pragmaticists have with literary genre, and asks to what extent linguists belonging to the Halliday tradition might be able to help. Literary pragmatists need a taxonomical apparatus that will a ply to genres of all kinds, literary or otherwise. They also need to describe how different genres help people perceive and parcel things up, and how genres function within sociocultural contexts. It seems that Hallidayan linguists may well have something to suggest here, even if their genre thinking is not yet fully developed to their own satisfaction. Furthermore, literary pragmaticist:: need to talk about changes in genres and in their relation to context. Here it is not immediately clear whether Halliday linguists can help. The question is: Do Hallidayans, as a matter of either principle or convenient practice, confine themselves to a synchronic approach? (Contains 39 references.) (JL) *********************************************************************** Re?roductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Literary genre and history: Questions from a literary pragmaticist for socio-semioticians GC by Roger D. Sell Op in GC Approaches to the analysis Zjj of literary discourse edited by Eija Ventola
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article presents the difficulties literary pragmaticists have with literary genre, and asks to what extent linguists belonging to the Halliday tradition might be able to help. Literary pragmatists need a taxonomical apparatus that will a ply to genres of all kinds, literary or otherwise. They also need to describe how different genres help people perceive and parcel things up, and how genres function within sociocultural contexts. It seems that Hallidayan linguists may well have something to suggest here, even if their genre thinking is not yet fully developed to their own satisfaction. Furthermore, literary pragmaticist:: need to talk about changes in genres and in their relation to context. Here it is not immediately clear whether Halliday linguists can help. The question is: Do Hallidayans, as a matter of either principle or convenient practice, confine themselves to a synchronic approach? (Contains 39 references.) (JL) *********************************************************************** Re?roductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Literary genre and history: Questions from a literary pragmaticist for socio-semioticians GC by Roger D. Sell Op in GC Approaches to the analysis Zjj of literary discourse edited by Eija Ventola
Key concepts: Literary science, Literary genre, Literary criticism, History of literature, Literature, Context (archaeology), Linguistics, Literary fiction