1991Unpublished venueRequires access

Literary Genre and History: Questions from a Literary Pragmaticist for Socio-Semioticians.

Roger D. Sell

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This article presents the difficulties literary pragmaticists have with literary genre, and asks to what extent linguists belonging to the Halliday tradition might be able to help. Literary pragmatists need a taxonomical apparatus that will a ply to genres of all kinds, literary or otherwise. They also need to describe how different genres help people perceive and parcel things up, and how genres function within sociocultural contexts. It seems that Hallidayan linguists may well have something to suggest here, even if their genre thinking is not yet fully developed to their own satisfaction. Furthermore, literary pragmaticist:: need to talk about changes in genres and in their relation to context. Here it is not immediately clear whether Halliday linguists can help. The question is: Do Hallidayans, as a matter of either principle or convenient practice, confine themselves to a synchronic approach? (Contains 39 references.) (JL) *********************************************************************** Re?roductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Literary genre and history: Questions from a literary pragmaticist for socio-semioticians GC by Roger D. Sell Op in GC Approaches to the analysis Zjj of literary discourse edited by Eija Ventola

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article presents the difficulties literary pragmaticists have with literary genre, and asks to what extent linguists belonging to the Halliday tradition might be able to help. Literary pragmatists need a taxonomical apparatus that will a ply to genres of all kinds, literary or otherwise. They also need to describe how different genres help people perceive and parcel things up, and how genres function within sociocultural contexts. It seems that Hallidayan linguists may well have something to suggest here, even if their genre thinking is not yet fully developed to their own satisfaction. Furthermore, literary pragmaticist:: need to talk about changes in genres and in their relation to context. Here it is not immediately clear whether Halliday linguists can help. The question is: Do Hallidayans, as a matter of either principle or convenient practice, confine themselves to a synchronic approach? (Contains 39 references.) (JL) *********************************************************************** Re?roductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Literary genre and history: Questions from a literary pragmaticist for socio-semioticians GC by Roger D. Sell Op in GC Approaches to the analysis Zjj of literary discourse edited by Eija Ventola

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article presents the difficulties literary pragmaticists have with literary genre, and asks to what extent linguists belonging to the Halliday tradition might be able to help. Literary pragmatists need a taxonomical apparatus that will a ply to genres of all kinds, literary or otherwise. They also need to describe how different genres help people perceive and parcel things up, and how genres function within sociocultural contexts. It seems that Hallidayan linguists may well have something to suggest here, even if their genre thinking is not yet fully developed to their own satisfaction. Furthermore, literary pragmaticist:: need to talk about changes in genres and in their relation to context. Here it is not immediately clear whether Halliday linguists can help. The question is: Do Hallidayans, as a matter of either principle or convenient practice, confine themselves to a synchronic approach? (Contains 39 references.) (JL) *********************************************************************** Re?roductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Literary genre and history: Questions from a literary pragmaticist for socio-semioticians GC by Roger D. Sell Op in GC Approaches to the analysis Zjj of literary discourse edited by Eija Ventola

Key concepts: Literary science, Literary genre, Literary criticism, History of literature, Literature, Context (archaeology), Linguistics, Literary fiction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Literary Genre and History: Questions from a Literary Pragmaticist for Socio-Semioticians. — Research Paper | ScholarLens